• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术中神经生理监测在经鼻内镜颅底手术中颈内动脉损伤的作用。

Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring in Internal Carotid Artery Injury During Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e43-e57. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.154. Epub 2020 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.154
PMID:33301995
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we investigated the role of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in internal carotid artery (ICA) injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS).

METHODS

The study group included all 13 patients who had experienced an ICA injury during EESBS with IONM from 2004 to 2017. The medical records were reviewed for the perioperative data. The IONM reports were reviewed to evaluate the baseline somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), electroencephalography (EEG), and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) and their significant changes related to ICA injury and/or the subsequent surgical/endovascular interventions.

RESULTS

All 13 patients had undergone SSEP and 7 patients had BAEP monitoring during surgery. EEG was added during emergent angiography following the surgery for 5 patients. Two patients showed significant SSEP changes, and one showed significant SSEP and EEG changes, indicating cerebral hypoperfusion. Of these 3 patients, patient 1 had experienced irreversible SSEP loss with postoperative stroke. Patients 2 and 3 had SSEP and/or EEG changes that had recovered to baseline after interventions without postoperative deficits. Despite ICA injury, 10 patients showed no significant SSEP and/or EEG changes, and all 7 patients with BAEP monitoring showed no significant BAEP changes, indicating adequate cerebral and brainstem perfusion, respectively. The injured ICA was sacrificed in 4 patients, of whom 3 showed stable SSEP and 1 had experienced irreversible SSEP loss. IONM correlated with the postoperative neurologic examination findings in all cases, adequately predicting the neurologic outcomes after ICA injury.

CONCLUSION

SSEP and EEG monitoring can accurately detect cerebral hypoperfusion and provide real-time feedback during surgery. SSEP and EEG changes predicted for neurologic outcomes and guide surgical decisions regarding the preservation or sacrifice of the ICA. Comprehensive multimodality monitoring according to the surgical risks can serve to detect and guide the management of ICA injury in EESBS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨术中神经监测(IONM)在经鼻内镜颅底手术(EESBS)中颈内动脉(ICA)损伤中的作用。

方法

研究组纳入了 2004 年至 2017 年间接受 EESBS 并伴有 IONM 的 13 例 ICA 损伤患者。回顾了围手术期数据。回顾了 IONM 报告,以评估基线体感诱发电位(SSEP)、脑电图(EEG)和脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)及其与 ICA 损伤和/或随后的手术/血管内干预相关的显著变化。

结果

所有 13 例患者均接受了 SSEP 监测,7 例患者接受了 BAEP 监测。5 例患者在术后紧急血管造影时加用了 EEG。其中 2 例患者 SSEP 发生明显变化,1 例患者 SSEP 和 EEG 均发生明显变化,提示脑灌注不足。这 3 例患者中,患者 1 术后发生不可逆性 SSEP 丧失伴脑卒中。患者 2 和 3 的 SSEP 和/或 EEG 变化在干预后恢复至基线,无术后缺损。尽管发生了 ICA 损伤,但 10 例患者的 SSEP 和/或 EEG 无明显变化,7 例接受 BAEP 监测的患者的 BAEP 无明显变化,分别提示脑和脑干灌注充足。4 例患者牺牲了损伤的 ICA,其中 3 例 SSEP 稳定,1 例发生不可逆性 SSEP 丧失。IONM 与术后神经检查结果在所有病例中均相关,充分预测了 ICA 损伤后的神经结局。

结论

SSEP 和 EEG 监测可准确检测脑灌注不足,并在手术过程中提供实时反馈。SSEP 和 EEG 变化预测神经结局,并指导关于保留或牺牲 ICA 的手术决策。根据手术风险进行全面的多模态监测,可以发现并指导 EESBS 中 ICA 损伤的管理。

相似文献

1
Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring in Internal Carotid Artery Injury During Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.术中神经生理监测在经鼻内镜颅底手术中颈内动脉损伤的作用。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e43-e57. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.154. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during endoscopic endonasal surgery for pediatric skull base tumors.小儿颅底肿瘤鼻内镜手术中的术中神经生理监测
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Feb;17(2):147-155. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.PEDS14403. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
3
Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgery: analysis of observed changes.内窥镜经鼻颅底手术中体感诱发电位监测:观察到的变化分析。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(1 Suppl Operative):ons64-76; discussion ons76. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821606e4.
4
A modified endovascular treatment protocol for iatrogenic internal carotid artery injuries following endoscopic endonasal surgery.内镜经鼻手术后医源性颈内动脉损伤的改良血管内治疗方案。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jan 25;132(2):343-350. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS181048. Print 2020 Feb 1.
5
Internal carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: A systematic review.鼻内镜手术中颈内动脉损伤:一项系统评价
Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):582-90. doi: 10.1002/lary.25748. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
Use of Adenosine to Facilitate Localization and Repair of Internal Carotid Artery Injury during Skull Base Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review.使用腺嘌呤促进颅底手术中颈内动脉损伤的定位和修复:病例报告及文献复习。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 May;130(5):532-536. doi: 10.1177/0003489420956373. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
7
Value of multimodality monitoring using brainstem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials in endoscopic endonasal surgery.脑干听觉诱发电位和体感诱发电位在鼻内镜鼻内手术中的多模态监测价值
Neurol Res. 2013 Jul;35(6):622-30. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000174. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
8
Predictive value of neurophysiologic monitoring during neurovascular intervention for postoperative new neurologic deficits.神经血管介入术中神经生理监测对术后新发神经功能缺损的预测价值
Neuroradiology. 2019 Feb;61(2):207-215. doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2115-0. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of somatosensory evoked potential and electroencephalography during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术期间体感诱发电位和脑电图的诊断准确性
Neurol Res. 2016 Aug;38(8):698-705. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1200707. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in paediatric Chiari surgery-help or hindrance?小儿Chiari手术中的术中神经生理监测——助力还是阻碍?
Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Oct;35(10):1769-1776. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04312-y. Epub 2019 Jul 25.