Suppr超能文献

社交团体干预对抑郁症的影响:系统评价。

The effects of social group interventions for depression: Systematic review.

机构信息

The University of Queensland, Australia.

The University of Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:67-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.125. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing prevalence of prolonged antidepressant use globally. Social group interventions may be an effective way to manage mild to moderate depression, especially with patients seeking to discontinue antidepressant use. This systematic review evaluates studies that used social group interventions to manage depression.

METHODS

Studies published up to June 2019 in nine bibliographic databases were identified using search terms related to depression, social interventions, and social participation. Formal therapies for depression (cognitive behaviour therapy, music therapy) were excluded as they have been reviewed elsewhere.

RESULTS

24 studies met inclusion criteria; 14 RCTs, 6 non-randomised controlled trials and 4 pre-post evaluations. In total, 28 social group programs were evaluated, 10 arts-based groups, 13 exercise groups and 5 others. Programs ranged in 'dose' from 5 to 150 hours (M = 31 hours) across 4 to 75 weeks (M = 15 weeks) and produced effect sizes on depression in the small to very large range (Hedge's g = .18 to 3.19, M = 1.14). A regression analysis revealed no participant variables, study variables or intervention variables were related to effect size on depression.

LIMITATIONS

Risks of bias were found, primarily in the non-randomised studies, which means the findings must be regarded as preliminary until replicated.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that social group interventions are an effective way to manage mild to moderate depression symptoms in a variety of populations. This approach may also help to prevent relapse among patients tapering off antidepressant medication.

摘要

背景

全球范围内,长期使用抗抑郁药的现象日益普遍。社会群体干预可能是一种有效管理轻度至中度抑郁症的方法,尤其是对于那些希望停止使用抗抑郁药的患者。本系统评价评估了使用社会群体干预来管理抑郁症的研究。

方法

使用与抑郁症、社会干预和社会参与相关的搜索词,在九个文献数据库中检索截至 2019 年 6 月发表的研究。排除了针对抑郁症的正规治疗(认知行为疗法、音乐疗法),因为它们已在其他地方进行了综述。

结果

共有 24 项研究符合纳入标准;14 项 RCT、6 项非随机对照试验和 4 项前后评估。共有 28 个社会群体项目得到了评估,其中 10 个是艺术团体,13 个是运动团体,还有 5 个其他团体。这些项目的“剂量”从 5 到 150 小时(平均值为 31 小时)不等,持续时间从 4 到 75 周(平均值为 15 周),对抑郁症的影响大小从小到非常大不等(Hedge's g 为.18 到 3.19,平均值为 1.14)。回归分析显示,参与者变量、研究变量或干预变量与抑郁症的效果大小无关。

局限性

发现存在偏倚风险,主要是在非随机研究中,这意味着这些发现必须被视为初步的,直到得到复制。

结论

这些发现表明,社会群体干预是一种有效管理各种人群轻度至中度抑郁症状的方法。这种方法也可能有助于预防正在减少抗抑郁药物剂量的患者复发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验