Suppr超能文献

[β-溶血性链球菌分离方法的比较]

[Comparison of methods for the isolation of beta-hemolytic streptococci].

作者信息

Civitelli F, Guglielmetti P, Partini N

机构信息

Istituto di Malattie Infettive Università, Siena.

出版信息

Quad Sclavo Diagn. 1987 Jun;23(2):225-7.

PMID:3330244
Abstract

Throat swabs from 334 patients, submitted to the clinical laboratory of the Institute of Infectious Diseases (Siena University), for isolation of beta-hemolytic streptococci, were inoculated and incubated aerobically and anaerobically. Beta-hemolytic streptococci were identified in 117 (35%) cases, including 77 group A streptococci. Group A streptococci were recovered significantly more often with anaerobic incubation than with aerobic incubation (77 versus 53 cases: P less than 0.01). Non-group A beta-hemolytic streptococci also were recovered significantly more often with anaerobic incubation (40 versus 22; P less than 0.01). We conclude that anaerobic incubation for throat cultures is superior to incubation in normal air for detection of beta-hemolytic streptococci.

摘要

334名患者的咽拭子被送往传染病研究所(锡耶纳大学)临床实验室,用于分离β溶血性链球菌,这些咽拭子分别进行了需氧和厌氧接种及培养。在117例(35%)病例中鉴定出β溶血性链球菌,其中包括77例A组链球菌。与需氧培养相比,厌氧培养时A组链球菌的检出率显著更高(77例对53例:P<0.01)。非A组β溶血性链球菌在厌氧培养时的检出率也显著更高(40例对22例;P<0.01)。我们得出结论,对于检测β溶血性链球菌,咽喉培养采用厌氧培养优于在正常空气中培养。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验