Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 如何改变我们对鼻骨骨折的处理方式及其对患者结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。

How COVID-19 Changed Our Management of Nasal Bone Fractures and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes-A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

ENT Department, Northwick Park Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

ENT Department, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ear Nose Throat J. 2022 Dec;101(10):671-676. doi: 10.1177/0145561320981439. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Nasal bone fractures are a common presentation to the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) surgeon. Simple, closed fractures are assessed and considered for closed manipulation under anesthesia (MUA #nasal bones). Most departments perform this under general anesthesia (GA). Our protocol changed in the face of COVID-19, where procedures were alternatively performed under local anesthesia (LA) in the clinic, to cope with lack of elective theater capacity during the pandemic, while still allowing a nasal fracture service to take place. We present postoperative patient outcomes on breathing and shape, comparing GA versus LA.

METHODS

Patient records retrospectively analyzed (January 2020-August 2020), and patients undergoing MUA #nasal bones interviewed by telephone after one month. Exclusion criteria were open injuries or depressed nasal bones requiring elevation. Breathing and shape scores were evaluated subjectively using a Likert scale (1 = very unsatisfied, 5 = very satisfied).

RESULTS

Two hundred five nasal injury referrals were made (21 MUA #nasal bones under GA and 27 under LA). Manipulation under anesthesia #nasal bones significantly improved both breathing satisfaction scores (GA; 2.88 ± 0.24 to 4.06 ± 0.23, < 0.05; LA; 2.86 ± 0.22 to 3.77 ± 0.27, < 0.05) and aesthetic scores (GA; 2.00 ± 0.21 to 3.94 ± 0.23, < 0.05; LA; 1.64 ± 0.19 to 3.59 ± 0.28, < 0.05) in both GA and LA groups. There was no statistically significant difference between LA and GA in postoperative outcomes. There was a trend toward greater satisfaction for GA, though this was not statistically significant and may be impacted by the rate of cartilaginous deformity in the LA group. Both techniques were well tolerated and most patients would repeat the procedure in hindsight.

CONCLUSIONS

Local anesthesia could provide a safer, cheaper, and satisfactory alternative for performing MUA #nasal bones in the clinic for selected patients, particularly with reduction of elective theater capacity in the event of further COVID-19 surges. We recommend training junior ENT surgeons to perform this procedure under supervision with adequate protective measures.

摘要

目的

鼻骨骨折是耳鼻喉科(ENT)医生常见的就诊原因。对于简单的闭合性骨折,在全身麻醉(GA)下进行评估并考虑闭合性手法复位(MUA#鼻骨)。大多数科室都在 GA 下进行这种操作。面对 COVID-19,我们的方案发生了变化,在疫情期间,为了应对缺乏选择性手术能力的情况,手术在门诊局部麻醉(LA)下进行,同时仍然允许开展鼻骨复位服务。我们比较了 GA 与 LA 两种情况下的术后患者呼吸和形状的结果。

方法

回顾性分析患者病历(2020 年 1 月至 2020 年 8 月),并在术后 1 个月通过电话对接受 MUA#鼻骨的患者进行访谈。排除标准为需要抬高的开放性损伤或凹陷性鼻骨。呼吸和形状评分采用李克特量表(1=非常不满意,5=非常满意)进行主观评估。

结果

共进行了 205 次鼻损伤转诊(21 例 GA 下的 MUA#鼻骨复位和 27 例 LA 下的 MUA#鼻骨复位)。麻醉下手法复位#鼻骨明显改善了呼吸满意度评分(GA:2.88±0.24 至 4.06±0.23,<0.05;LA:2.86±0.22 至 3.77±0.27,<0.05)和美学评分(GA:2.00±0.21 至 3.94±0.23,<0.05;LA:1.64±0.19 至 3.59±0.28,<0.05),在 GA 和 LA 组中均如此。LA 和 GA 之间术后结果无统计学差异。虽然 GA 的满意度趋势较高,但无统计学意义,这可能受到 LA 组软骨畸形率的影响。两种技术均耐受良好,大多数患者事后会重复该操作。

结论

对于选择性患者,局部麻醉可在门诊为患者安全、经济地提供替代全身麻醉下进行 MUA#鼻骨复位的方法,特别是在再次发生 COVID-19 疫情时,选择性手术能力降低。我们建议培训初级耳鼻喉科医生在监督下使用适当的保护措施来进行该操作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验