• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乒乒乓乓效应作为一种稳健的视觉错觉:来自操作指令的证据。

The Pong Effect as a Robust Visual Illusion: Evidence From Manipulating Instructions.

机构信息

Colorado State University, United States.

出版信息

Perception. 2020 Dec;49(12):1362-1370. doi: 10.1177/0301006620972876.

DOI:10.1177/0301006620972876
PMID:33302772
Abstract

Visual perception is not always veridical but can be influenced by factors such as ease of acting, energetic cost, and even body type of the observer. This notion is called action-specific perception. Several effects of action capability on visual perception have been found, but there is much controversy as to whether these effects are truly perceptual. Because perception cannot be measured directly, resolving the controversy relies on ruling out alternative explanations through systematic testing. We combined one of the most robust action-specific effects (the Pong effect) with one of the primary suggestions for exploring an alternative explanation, namely whether the effect persists across instructions that emphasize different aspects of the task. The Pong effect was robust to the type of instructions. The results provide critical evidence that the Pong effect is truly perceptual, furthering the argument that a person's ability to act can influence visual perception.

摘要

视觉感知并不总是准确的,但会受到易于行动、能量成本甚至观察者体型等因素的影响。这种概念被称为动作特异性感知。已经发现了动作能力对视觉感知的几种影响,但对于这些影响是否真的是感知性的,存在很大争议。由于无法直接测量感知,解决争议依赖于通过系统测试排除替代解释。我们将最强大的动作特异性效应之一(乒乓效应)与探索替代解释的主要建议之一结合起来,即该效应是否在强调任务不同方面的指令下仍然存在。乒乓效应不受指令类型的影响。研究结果提供了关键证据,表明乒乓效应是真正的感知性的,进一步证明了一个人的行动能力可以影响视觉感知。

相似文献

1
The Pong Effect as a Robust Visual Illusion: Evidence From Manipulating Instructions.乒乒乓乓效应作为一种稳健的视觉错觉:来自操作指令的证据。
Perception. 2020 Dec;49(12):1362-1370. doi: 10.1177/0301006620972876.
2
Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation.视觉空间错觉:一种通用解释。
Science. 1972 Mar 24;175(4028):1335-40. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4028.1335.
3
What you see and what you are told: an action-specific effect that is unaffected by explicit feedback.你所看到的与你被告知的内容:一种不受明确反馈影响的特定动作效应。
Psychol Res. 2018 May;82(3):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0848-8. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.行动中的错觉:空间属性不一致处理的后果。
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Nov;147(2):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1185-7. Epub 2002 Sep 28.
5
Negative affect impedes perceptual filling-in in the uniformity illusion.负性情绪会阻碍均匀错觉中的知觉填充。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Feb;98:103258. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103258. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
6
The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.乌兹纳泽错觉揭示了相对大小对感知和行动的类似影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Apr;237(4):953-965. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05480-8. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Action's influence on spatial perception: resolution and a mystery.动作对空间感知的影响:分辨率和一个谜团。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Apr;32:153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.045. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion.对掩蔽的穆勒-莱尔图形的延迟指向运动受目标大小的影响,但不受错觉的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1903-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.017. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
9
Time course of the effect of the Muller-Lyer illusion on saccades and perceptual judgments.米勒-莱尔错觉对视扫视和知觉判断影响的时间进程。
J Vis. 2014 Jan 6;14(1):4. doi: 10.1167/14.1.4.
10
Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.在受限和非受限观察条件下,蜜蜂对环境大小错觉的感知。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2278.

引用本文的文献

1
Instruction alters the influence of allocentric landmarks in a reach task.指导改变了在伸展任务中对以自我为中心的地标物的影响。
J Vis. 2024 Jul 2;24(7):17. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.7.17.