• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过体外测试对本地及政府药房中不同品牌双氯芬酸钠片进行的比较质量控制研究

Comparative Quality Control Study of Different Brands of Diclofenac Sodium Tablet Available in Local and Government Pharmacies by In-Vitro Testing.

作者信息

Gupta Madan Mohan, Khoorban Avinash, Ali Ahamad, Ramlogan Ornella, Talukdar Debjyoti

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO.

College of Pharmacy, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Pharmacy, Moradabad, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Nov 5;12(11):e11348. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11348.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.11348
PMID:33304683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7720920/
Abstract

The objective of this study is to conduct in-vitro quality control testing of diclofenac sodium tablets involves weight variation test, drug assay, friability test, and the disintegration and dissolution test. Two brands of diclofenac sodium tablets were used in the study, named Brand A and Brand B. Quality control (QC) test results for diclofenac sodium tablets show that both Brand A and Brand B conform to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards. In terms of weight variation, Brand A and B have an above the mean weight limit variation of 2.79% and 2.05%, respectively. The lower mean weight limit variations are 1.21% and 1.27%, respectively, which are within the 10% standard limits of USP. Friability tests show that Brands A and B have an average friability of 0.062% and 0.01% mass loss, which are within the 1% mass loss limits of USP. In terms of drug assay, both Brands A and B fall under the USP parameter of 85%-115%, respectively. The disintegration test shows that Brand A and Brand B fall within a 15-minute time interval segment with disintegration time calculated as 6.69 min and 7.02 min for Brands A and B, respectively. Brand B of Diclofenac Sodium has a drug dissolution percentage of 90.7% within a 45-min sampling time interval. Brands A and B pass the pharmacopeia limits set under the USP standards. The friability test shows that the loss of mass for both Brands A and B was within the 1% standard limit. Similarly, with regard to weight variation, both brands conform under the normal limit of 10% above or lower the mean weight. In terms of drug assay, both brands' drug availability was within the specified 85%-115% standard range. They passed the disintegration and dissolution test within a time limit of less than 15 minutes and 45 minutes, respectively.

摘要

本研究的目的是对双氯芬酸钠片剂进行体外质量控制测试,包括重量差异测试、药物含量测定、脆碎度测试以及崩解和溶出度测试。研究中使用了两个品牌的双氯芬酸钠片剂,分别为品牌A和品牌B。双氯芬酸钠片剂的质量控制(QC)测试结果表明,品牌A和品牌B均符合美国药典(USP)标准。在重量差异方面,品牌A和品牌B高于平均重量限制的差异分别为2.79%和2.05%。较低的平均重量限制差异分别为1.21%和1.27%,均在USP的10%标准限度内。脆碎度测试表明,品牌A和品牌B的平均脆碎度质量损失分别为0.062%和0.01%,均在USP的1%质量损失限度内。在药物含量测定方面,品牌A和品牌B分别符合USP参数的85%-115%。崩解测试表明,品牌A和品牌B在15分钟的时间间隔内崩解,品牌A和品牌B的崩解时间分别计算为6.69分钟和7.02分钟。双氯芬酸钠品牌B在45分钟的采样时间间隔内药物溶出百分比为90.7%。品牌A和品牌B通过了USP标准设定的药典限度。脆碎度测试表明,品牌A和品牌B的质量损失均在1%标准限度内。同样,在重量差异方面,两个品牌均符合平均重量上下10%的正常限度。在药物含量测定方面,两个品牌的药物可用性均在规定的85%-115%标准范围内。它们分别在不到15分钟和45分钟的时间限制内通过了崩解和溶出度测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e911/7720920/d488d00c4a9f/cureus-0012-00000011348-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e911/7720920/0323fe451255/cureus-0012-00000011348-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e911/7720920/1818bd756127/cureus-0012-00000011348-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e911/7720920/d488d00c4a9f/cureus-0012-00000011348-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e911/7720920/0323fe451255/cureus-0012-00000011348-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e911/7720920/1818bd756127/cureus-0012-00000011348-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e911/7720920/d488d00c4a9f/cureus-0012-00000011348-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Quality Control Study of Different Brands of Diclofenac Sodium Tablet Available in Local and Government Pharmacies by In-Vitro Testing.通过体外测试对本地及政府药房中不同品牌双氯芬酸钠片进行的比较质量控制研究
Cureus. 2020 Nov 5;12(11):e11348. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11348.
2
In vitro quality evaluation of leading brands of ciprofloxacin tablets available in Bangladesh.孟加拉国市场上主要品牌环丙沙星片剂的体外质量评估。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 May 30;10(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2507-y.
3
In vitro comparative quality evaluation of different brands of carbamazepine tablets commercially available in Dessie town, Northeast Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚东北部德西镇市售的不同品牌卡马西平片的体外比较质量评估。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 May 25;24(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40360-023-00670-1.
4
In-vitro Evaluations of Quality Control Parameters of Paracetamol Tablets Marketed in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔市市售对乙酰氨基酚片质量控制参数的体外评估
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2020 Dec 21;12:273-279. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S282420. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparative bioavailability and in vitro characterization of two brands of diclofenac sodium enteric-coated tablets.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1988 Oct;26(10):487-91.
6
In vitro Comparative Quality Assessment of Different Brands of Furosemide Tablets Marketed in Northwest Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚西北部市场上不同品牌呋塞米片的体外比较质量评估。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Nov 24;14:5119-5128. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S280203. eCollection 2020.
7
Pharmaceutical quality of seven brands of diclofenac tablet on the Saudi market.沙特市场七种品牌双氯芬酸钠片的药品质量。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Nov 26;13(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05385-8.
8
Evaluation of Seven Different Brands of Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets Available in the Market in Gondar City, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚贡德尔市市场上七种不同品牌盐酸二甲双胍片的评估
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2024 Feb 1;16:19-28. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S419522. eCollection 2024.
9
The chemical and pharmaceutical equivalence of sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine tablets sold on the Tanzanian market.坦桑尼亚市场上销售的周效磺胺/乙胺嘧啶片的化学和药学等效性。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2005 Dec;30(6):575-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2005.00687.x.
10
Report: A comparative study of loratidine physiochemical properties from different brands.报告:不同品牌氯雷他定理化性质的比较研究。
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018 Nov;31(6):2569-2574.

引用本文的文献

1
Enteric-coating film effect on the delayed drug release of pantoprazole gastro-resistant generic tablets.肠溶性包衣膜对泮托拉唑肠溶片延迟释放的影响。
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 12;12:1325. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.140607.1. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Diclofenac sodium multisource prolonged release tablets--a comparative study on the dissolution profiles.双氯芬酸钠多源缓释片——溶出曲线的对比研究
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005 Apr 1;37(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.11.041. Epub 2004 Dec 22.
2
In vitro and in vivo comparison of two diclofenac sodium sustained release oral formulations.两种双氯芬酸钠缓释口服制剂的体外和体内比较
Int J Pharm. 2003 Jul 9;260(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(03)00237-0.
3
The mechanisms of action of NSAIDs in analgesia.非甾体抗炎药的镇痛作用机制。
Drugs. 1996;52 Suppl 5:13-23. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199600525-00004.
4
Diclofenac sodium. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy.双氯芬酸钠。对其药效学和药代动力学特性以及治疗效果的重新评估。
Drugs. 1988 Mar;35(3):244-85. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835030-00004.