Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Juan Badiano No. 1. Col. Seccion XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico.
Sociomedical Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Ignacio Chavez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 11;12(12):CD004102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004102.pub3.
People with Chagas disease may develop progressive and lethal heart conditions. Drugs to eliminate the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T cruzi) currently carry limited therapeutic value and are used in the early stages of the disease. Extending the use of these drugs to treat chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy (CCC) has also been proposed.
To assess the benefits and harms of nitrofurans and trypanocidal drugs for treating late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC in terms of blood parasite reduction or clearance, mortality, adverse effects, and quality of life.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS databases on 12 November 2019. We also searched two clinical trials registers, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), on 3 December 2019.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing trypanocidal drugs versus placebo or no treatment for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC.
We conducted the reporting of the review according the standard Cochrane methods. Two review authors independently retrieved articles, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by a third review author. We contacted study authors for additional information.
We included two studies in this review update. One RCT randomly assigned 26 participants to benznidazole 5 mg/kg/day; 27 participants to nifurtimox 5 mg/kg/day; and 24 participants to placebo for 30 days. The second RCT, newly included in this update, randomised 1431 participants to benznidazole 300 mg/day for 40 to 80 days and 1423 participants to placebo. We also identified one ongoing study. Benznidazole compared to placebo At five-year follow-up, low quality of the evidence suggests that there may be a benefit of benznidazole when compared to placebo for clearance or reduction of antibody titres (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.37; 1 trial; 1896 participants). We are uncertain about the effects of benznidazole for the clearance of parasitaemia demonstrated by negative xenodiagnosis, blood culture, and/or molecular assays due to very limited evidence. Low quality of the evidence suggests that when compared to placebo, benznidazole may make little to no difference in the risk of heart failure (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.14; 1 trial; 2854 participants) and ventricular tachycardia (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26; 1 trial; 2854 participants). We found moderate quality of the evidence that adverse events increase with benznidazole when compared to placebo (RR 2.52, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.03; 1 trial; 2854 participants). Adverse effects were observed in 23.9% of patients in the benznidazole group compared to 9.5% in the placebo group. The most frequent adverse effects were: cutaneous rash, gastrointestinal symptoms, and peripheral polyneuropathy. No data were available for the outcomes of pathological demonstration of tissue parasites and quality of life. Nifurtimox compared to placebo Data were only available for this comparison for the outcome clearance or reduction of antibody titres, and we are uncertain about the effect due to very limited evidence. Regarding adverse events, one RCT mentioned in a general manner that nifurtimox caused intense adverse events, without any quantification.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of the trypanocidal drugs benznidazole and nifurtimox for late-stage, symptomatic Chagas disease and CCC.
患有恰加斯病的人可能会发展出进行性和致命的心脏疾病。目前用于消除寄生虫克氏锥虫(Trypanosoma cruzi)的药物治疗价值有限,仅用于疾病的早期阶段。有人提议将这些药物的使用范围扩大到治疗慢性恰加斯心肌病(CCC)。
评估硝基呋喃类药物和杀寄生虫药物在减少或清除血液寄生虫、死亡率、不良反应和生活质量方面,治疗晚期有症状的恰加斯病和 CCC 的疗效和安全性。
我们于 2019 年 11 月 12 日在 Cochrane 中心对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase 和 LILACS 数据库进行了检索。我们还于 2019 年 12 月 3 日在临床试验注册库(ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP))进行了检索。
我们纳入了评估杀寄生虫药物与安慰剂或不治疗晚期有症状的恰加斯病和 CCC 的随机对照试验(RCT)。
我们根据标准的 Cochrane 方法报告了综述的结果。两位综述作者独立检索文章、进行数据提取和评估偏倚风险。任何分歧均由第三位综述作者解决。我们联系了研究作者以获取更多信息。
我们在本次综述更新中纳入了两项研究。一项 RCT 将 26 名参与者随机分配到苯并咪唑 5mg/kg/天组;27 名参与者分到硝呋莫司 5mg/kg/天组;24 名参与者分到安慰剂组,疗程为 30 天。第二项新纳入的 RCT 将 1431 名参与者随机分配到苯并咪唑 300mg/天治疗 40-80 天组,1423 名参与者分到安慰剂组。我们还发现了一项正在进行的研究。苯并咪唑与安慰剂相比,在 5 年随访时,低质量证据表明,与安慰剂相比,苯并咪唑可能对清除或降低抗体滴度有一定的益处(风险比(RR)1.25,95%置信区间(CI)1.14 至 1.37;1 项试验;1896 名参与者)。我们对由于证据非常有限而导致的通过阴性皮内诊断、血液培养和/或分子检测显示的寄生虫清除效果,对苯并咪唑的效果持不确定态度。低质量证据表明,与安慰剂相比,苯并咪唑在心力衰竭(RR 0.89,95%置信区间(CI)0.69 至 1.14;1 项试验;2854 名参与者)和室性心动过速(RR 0.80,95%置信区间(CI)0.51 至 1.26;1 项试验;2854 名参与者)的风险方面可能没有什么影响。我们发现了苯并咪唑的不良反应发生率高于安慰剂的中等质量证据(RR 2.52,95%置信区间(CI)2.09 至 3.03;1 项试验;2854 名参与者)。与安慰剂组(23.9%)相比,苯并咪唑组中观察到的不良反应更为常见,为 9.5%。最常见的不良反应是:皮疹、胃肠道症状和周围性多发性神经病。没有数据可用于组织寄生虫的病理证明和生活质量的结果。
硝呋莫司与安慰剂相比只有关于清除或降低抗体滴度的结果数据,由于证据非常有限,我们对效果持不确定态度。关于不良反应,一项 RCT 只是笼统地提到硝呋莫司会引起强烈的不良反应,但没有任何量化。
目前尚无足够的证据支持硝基呋喃类药物苯并咪唑和硝呋莫司在晚期有症状的恰加斯病和 CCC 中的疗效。