Suppr超能文献

有效性论证:消除误解。

The validity argument: Addressing the misconceptions.

作者信息

Gasmalla Hosam Eldeen Elsadig, Tahir Mohamed Elnajid

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.

Research and Education Development, Sudan International University, Khartoum, Sudan.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2021 Dec;43(12):1453-1455. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1856802. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

Abstract

Assessment of students necessitates validity. Validity provides strong reasoning for decisions made based on students' scores. It is a unitary concept; the extent to which evidence supports and justify the proposed interpretations of test scores. However, the comprehension of the concept of validity has been associated with some observed misconceptions in the literature. With the consequent impact on the research and application being in consideration, this work aims to address some associated misconceptions to clarify the concept of validity. In doing so, we are adopting the current standard framework that is based on the five sources of validity.

摘要

对学生的评估需要有效性。有效性为基于学生分数所做的决策提供有力依据。它是一个统一的概念;即证据支持并证明对考试分数所提出解释的程度。然而,文献中发现对有效性概念的理解存在一些误解。考虑到其对研究和应用的后续影响,这项工作旨在解决一些相关的误解,以阐明有效性的概念。在此过程中,我们采用基于有效性五个来源的当前标准框架。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验