Suppr超能文献

与腹腔内感染的预后相关的分离情况是吗?不,但接受经验性抗假单胞菌药物的情况是。

Is the Isolation of Associated with Outcomes from Intra-Abdominal Infection? No, But the Receipt of an Empiric Anti-Pseudomonal Agent Is.

作者信息

Chou Jesse, Knight Patrick H, Sawyer Robert G

机构信息

Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Sep;22(7):675-679. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.396. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

Abstract

is isolated at variable rates from intra-abdominal infections (IAI). Not all recommended empiric regimens for IAI include anti- activity, for example, ceftriaxone and metronidazole. We hypothesized that within an adult population, is a relatively rare isolate and has no association with mortality, and thus, empiric therapy with anti- activity is not warranted. All IAI with positive cultures treated between 1997 and 2017 at a single institution were analyzed. This data set was divided into two cohorts, namely, those with cultures positive for and those without. Demographics and in-hospital mortality were compared by Student t-test and χ analysis. Predictors of isolation of and in-hospital mortality were done by logistic regression (LR) analysis. In total, 2,420 IAIs were identified, 104 (4.3%) with and 2,316 (95.7%) without. Major demographic differences between patients with and those without included a higher rate of health-care-associated infections (87/104, 83.7% vs. 621/2316, 26.8%; p = 0.02), a higher rate of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections (23/104, 22.1% vs. 329/2316, 14.2%; p = 0.04) and a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (17.7 ± 0.8 vs. 14.5 ± 0.2; p < 0.0001). There was an increased rate of isolation with increasing APACHE II score. Independent predictors of isolation of by LR included APACHE II score and days of hospitalization prior to diagnosis. Crude in-hospital mortality was similar between groups: 14/104 (13.5%) and 276/2316 (11.9%), p = 0.79. After controlling for age, gender, APACHE II, prior transfusion, immunosuppression status, solid organ transplant status, healthcare-association, and days of hospitalization prior to diagnosis, the isolation of was not associated with mortality. is infrequently isolated and overall not associated with mortality. Nonetheless, there may be a population that merits empiric anti- therapy: those with APACHE II ≥20 or a significant length of hospitalization prior to diagnosis.

摘要

在腹腔内感染(IAI)中以不同比例分离得到。并非所有推荐用于IAI的经验性治疗方案都包含抗[具体病原体]活性,例如头孢曲松和甲硝唑。我们假设在成年人群中,[具体病原体]是一种相对罕见的分离菌,与死亡率无关,因此,不建议进行具有抗[具体病原体]活性的经验性治疗。对1997年至2017年在单一机构接受治疗且培养结果为阳性的所有IAI进行了分析。该数据集被分为两个队列,即培养结果为[具体病原体]阳性的队列和培养结果为阴性的队列。通过学生t检验和χ分析比较人口统计学特征和院内死亡率。通过逻辑回归(LR)分析确定[具体病原体]分离和院内死亡率的预测因素。总共识别出2420例IAI,其中104例(4.3%)培养结果为[具体病原体]阳性,2316例(95.7%)培养结果为阴性。培养结果为[具体病原体]阳性和阴性的患者之间主要的人口统计学差异包括医疗保健相关感染率较高(87/104,83.7%对621/2316,26.8%;p = 0.02)、重症监护病房(ICU)获得性感染率较高(23/104,22.1%对329/2316,14.2%;p = 0.04)以及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分(APACHE)II较高(17.7±0.8对14.5±0.2;p < 0.0001)。随着APACHE II评分升高,[具体病原体]分离率增加。通过LR分析,[具体病原体]分离的独立预测因素包括APACHE II评分和诊断前住院天数。两组的粗院内死亡率相似:[具体病原体]阳性组为14/104(13.5%),阴性组为276/2316(11.9%),p = 0.79。在控制了年龄、性别、APACHE II、既往输血、免疫抑制状态、实体器官移植状态、医疗保健相关性以及诊断前住院天数后,[具体病原体]的分离与死亡率无关。[具体病原体]很少被分离出来,总体上与死亡率无关。尽管如此,可能有一部分人群值得进行经验性抗[具体病原体]治疗:APACHE II≥20或诊断前住院时间较长的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验