Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Mar;22(2):131-143. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.001. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Delayed treatment of seriously infected patients results in increased mortality. However, antimicrobial therapy for the initial 24 to 48 hours is mostly empirically provided, without evidence regarding the causative pathogen. Whether empiric anti-enterococcal therapy should be administered to treat intra-abdominal infection (IAI) before obtaining culture results remains unknown. We performed a meta-analysis to explore the effects of empiric enterococci covered antibiotic therapy in IAI and the risk factors for enterococcal infection in IAI. We searched multiple databases systematically and included 23 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 observational studies. The quality of included studies was assessed, and the reporting bias was evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects or fixed effects models according to the heterogeneity. The risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Enterococci-covered antibiotic regimens provided no improvement in treatment success compared with control regimens (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00; p = 0.15), with similar mortality and adverse effects in both arms. Basic characteristic analysis revealed that most of the enrolled patients with IAI in RCTs were young, lower risk community-acquired intra-abdominal infection (CA-IAI) patients with a relatively low APACHE II score. Interestingly, risk factor screening revealed that malignancy, corticosteroid use, operation, any antibiotic treatment, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), and indwelling urinary catheter could predispose the patients with IAI to a substantially higher risk of enterococcal infection. "Hospital acquired" itself was a risk factor (OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.34-3.39; p < 0.001). It is unnecessary to use additional agents empirically to specifically provide anti-enterococcal coverage for the management of CA-IAI in lower risk patients without evidence of causative pathogen, and risk factors can increase the risk of enterococcal infection. Thus, there is a rationale for providing empiric anti-enterococcal coverage for severely ill patients with CA-IAI with high risk factors and patients with hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infection (HA-IAI).
延误严重感染患者的治疗会导致死亡率增加。然而,最初 24 至 48 小时的抗菌治疗主要是经验性的,没有关于病原体的证据。在获得培养结果之前,是否应该给予经验性抗肠球菌治疗来治疗腹腔内感染(IAI)仍然未知。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以探讨经验性肠球菌覆盖抗生素治疗在 IAI 中的作用,以及肠球菌感染的危险因素。我们系统地搜索了多个数据库,纳入了 23 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 13 项观察性研究。评估了纳入研究的质量,并评估了报告偏倚。根据异质性,使用随机效应或固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。计算风险比(RR)、优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。与对照组相比,肠球菌覆盖抗生素方案在治疗成功率方面没有改善(RR,0.99;95%CI,0.97-1.00;p=0.15),两组的死亡率和不良反应相似。基本特征分析表明,大多数 RCT 中 IAI 患者是年轻的、低风险的社区获得性腹腔内感染(CA-IAI)患者,APACHE II 评分相对较低。有趣的是,危险因素筛查显示,恶性肿瘤、皮质类固醇使用、手术、任何抗生素治疗、入住重症监护病房(ICU)和留置导尿管会使 IAI 患者面临更高的肠球菌感染风险。“医院获得”本身就是一个危险因素(OR,2.81;95%CI,2.34-3.39;p<0.001)。对于没有病原体证据的低风险患者,没有必要使用额外的药物经验性地专门提供抗肠球菌覆盖,而危险因素会增加肠球菌感染的风险。因此,对于有高危险因素的 CA-IAI 重症患者和医院获得性腹腔内感染(HA-IAI)患者,提供经验性抗肠球菌覆盖是合理的。