• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethical considerations and interdisciplinary approach to research on COVID-19 pandemic: The response of Iran University of Medical Sciences.新冠疫情研究中的伦理考量与跨学科方法:伊朗医科大学的应对措施
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Jul 29;34:87. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.87. eCollection 2020.
2
Situation analysis of local ethical committees in medical sciences in Iran.伊朗医学领域地方伦理委员会的现状分析
J Res Med Sci. 2011 Mar;16(3):310-5.
3
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
4
Ethics committees in the time of COVID-19.COVID-19 时期的伦理委员会。
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):113-118. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.109.
5
Challenges and practices arising during public health emergencies: A qualitative survey on ethics committees.突发公共卫生事件中的挑战与实践:伦理委员会的定性调查。
Dev World Bioeth. 2023 Mar;23(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12345. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
6
Pandemic preparedness and responsiveness of research review committees: lessons from review of COVID-19 protocols at KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme in Kenya.研究审查委员会的大流行防范与应对能力:肯尼亚肯尼亚医学研究协会惠康信托研究计划对新冠病毒疾病方案审查的经验教训
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Jun 21;7:75. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17533.2. eCollection 2022.
7
Implementing a National Approach to Research Ethics Review during a Pandemic - the Irish Experience.在大流行期间实施国家研究伦理审查方法——爱尔兰的经验
HRB Open Res. 2020 Nov 16;3:63. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13146.2. eCollection 2020.
8
Challenges During Review of COVID-19 Research Proposals: Experience of Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University Research Ethics Committee, Egypt.新型冠状病毒肺炎研究提案审查期间的挑战:埃及艾因夏姆斯大学医学院研究伦理委员会的经验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 2;8:715796. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.715796. eCollection 2021.
9
Reviewing the reviewers: a survey of institutional ethics committees in Australia.审视评审者:对澳大利亚机构伦理委员会的一项调查
Med J Aust. 1990 Mar 19;152(6):289-96. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb120948.x.
10
Addressing the challenge for expedient ethical review of research in disasters and disease outbreaks.解决灾害和疾病暴发研究中快速伦理审查的挑战。
Bioethics. 2019 Mar;33(3):343-346. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12543. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Research ethics review during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international study.COVID-19 大流行期间的研究伦理审查:一项国际研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0292512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292512. eCollection 2024.
2
Research ethics committees: A forum where scientists, editors, and policymakers can cooperate during pandemics.研究伦理委员会:科学家、编辑和政策制定者在大流行期间可以合作的论坛。
Med Sci Law. 2022 Jul;62(3):230-232. doi: 10.1177/00258024221075469. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Research and Global Health Emergencies: On the Essential Role of Best Practice.研究与全球卫生突发事件:论最佳实践的重要作用。
Public Health Ethics. 2018 Jul 24;11(3):237-250. doi: 10.1093/phe/phy014. eCollection 2018 Nov.
2
Research Ethics Governance in Times of Ebola.埃博拉疫情期间的研究伦理治理
Public Health Ethics. 2017 Apr;10(1):49-61. doi: 10.1093/phe/phw039. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
3
Research in disaster settings: a systematic qualitative review of ethical guidelines.灾害环境中的研究:伦理准则的系统质性综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 21;17(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0148-7.
4
Ethical implications of diversity in disaster research.灾害研究中多样性的伦理影响。
Am J Disaster Med. 2012 Summer;7(3):211-21. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2012.0096.
5
A framework for research ethics review during public emergencies.突发公共卫生事件期间研究伦理审查框架。
CMAJ. 2010 Oct 5;182(14):1533-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090976. Epub 2010 Jun 7.

新冠疫情研究中的伦理考量与跨学科方法:伊朗医科大学的应对措施

Ethical considerations and interdisciplinary approach to research on COVID-19 pandemic: The response of Iran University of Medical Sciences.

作者信息

Hashemi Akram, Bahmani Fatemeh, Saeedi Tehrani Saeedeh, Forouzandeh Mina, Koohpayehzadeh Jalil, Ashrafi Mortaza, Khalajzadeh Majid Reza, Motevalian Seyed Abbas

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Jul 29;34:87. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.87. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.34171/mjiri.34.87
PMID:33306052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7711043/
Abstract

Research ethics committees are comprised of policymakers, supervisors, and decision-makers and aim at increasing adherence to professional ethics standards in conducting health-related research. The existential philosophy of these committees is to preserve the patients' health, maintain and promote public trust in health care providers, protect the rights of both patients and health care providers, and promote organizational ethics. However, this task can be complex and challenging during a public health emergency. Research ethics committees set the standard of research in the emergency situations through defining which research has the potential to promote the quality of response to a public health emergency. This study aims at collecting and classifying the valuable experiences of the research ethics committee members and reviewers during the early days of the COVID-19 epidemic in Iran University of Medical Sciences, one of the major universities in Tehran. It provides a basic understanding of the key concepts and challenges in reviewing and approving research by research ethics committees and the recommendations to overcome these challenging issues. To accelerate the review process of COVID-19 research proposals, the scientific, methodological and ethical review panel was integrated as a large committee called 'IUMS Corona Research Team'. The first meeting was held on March 7, two weeks after the official announcement of the first case of the disease and is continued once a week. A total of 130 projects have been discussed and evaluated in this committee, among which 83 proposals were approved after modification. An interdisciplinary approach supports a flexible and effective scientific and ethical review of research leading to more protection of research subjects as well as promotion in the treatment and management of the pandemic ahead.

摘要

研究伦理委员会由政策制定者、监督者和决策者组成,旨在提高在开展与健康相关研究时对职业道德标准的遵守程度。这些委员会的存在理念是维护患者健康、维持并增进公众对医疗服务提供者的信任、保护患者和医疗服务提供者双方的权利以及促进组织伦理。然而,在突发公共卫生事件期间,这项任务可能既复杂又具有挑战性。研究伦理委员会通过界定哪些研究有潜力提升应对突发公共卫生事件的质量,来设定紧急情况下的研究标准。本研究旨在收集并分类伊朗医科大学(德黑兰的主要大学之一)研究伦理委员会成员和评审人员在新冠疫情初期的宝贵经验。它提供了对研究伦理委员会在审查和批准研究过程中的关键概念和挑战以及克服这些挑战性问题的建议的基本理解。为加快新冠研究提案的审查进程,科学、方法和伦理审查小组合并为一个名为“伊朗医科大学新冠研究团队”的大型委员会。第一次会议于3月7日举行,即该疾病首例官方通报两周后,此后每周举行一次。该委员会共讨论和评估了130个项目,其中83项提案经修改后获得批准。跨学科方法支持对研究进行灵活有效的科学和伦理审查,从而更有效地保护研究对象,并推动未来大流行病的治疗和管理。