Suppr超能文献

改进聚维酮碘和碘制剂用于斑贴试验。

Improving povidone-iodine and iodine preparations for patch testing.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Lower Saxony Institute of Occupational Dermatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2021 May;84(5):332-337. doi: 10.1111/cod.13760. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allergy evaluation by patch testing with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) or iodine remains challenging, because current patch test preparations frequently lead to false-positive or irritant skin reactions.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate different preparations for iodine patch tests and to assess their clinical relevance with repeated open application tests (ROATs).

METHODS

We monocentrically analyzed 95 patients with suspected allergy to disinfectants in retrospect who underwent parallel iodine patch testing with four preparations: PVP-I 2% aq., 5% aq., 10% aq., and iodine 0.5% pet.

RESULTS

In 27 of 95 patients (28.4%), we found positive reactions to one of the four test preparations. After ROATs in 22 of these 27 positively tested individuals, only one patient was diagnosed with iodine allergy. In contrast, 31 of 95 patients (32.6%) showed irritant or questionable patch test reactions on day 2 (D2) and/or D3 and/or D7 to one or more test preparations. Testing with PVP-I 2% aq. resulted in the lowest number of doubtful skin reactions while detecting the single allergic patient.

CONCLUSION

PVP-I 2% aq. was found to be the optimal patch test preparation. In general, iodine allergy appears to be substantially overestimated, and positive patch test responses to iodine should prompt an urgent ROAT for confirmation before diagnosing iodine allergy.

摘要

背景

使用聚维酮碘(PVP-I)或碘进行斑贴试验评估过敏仍然具有挑战性,因为目前的斑贴试验制剂经常导致假阳性或刺激性皮肤反应。

目的

研究不同的碘斑贴试验制剂,并通过重复开放性应用试验(ROAT)评估其临床相关性。

方法

我们回顾性地对 95 名疑似对消毒剂过敏的患者进行了单中心分析,并行进行了四种制剂的碘斑贴试验:2%PVP-I 水剂、5%PVP-I 水剂、10%PVP-I 水剂和 0.5%碘剂软膏。

结果

在 95 名患者中的 27 名(28.4%),我们发现对四种试验制剂中的一种有阳性反应。在这 27 名阳性测试个体中的 22 名进行 ROAT 后,仅 1 名患者被诊断为碘过敏。相比之下,在 95 名患者中的 31 名(32.6%)在 D2 和/或 D3 和/或 D7 对一种或多种试验制剂出现刺激性或可疑斑贴试验反应。在检测到单一过敏患者的同时,2%PVP-I 水剂试验导致可疑皮肤反应的数量最少。

结论

2%PVP-I 水剂被发现是最佳的斑贴试验制剂。一般来说,碘过敏似乎被大大高估了,对碘的阳性斑贴试验反应应在诊断碘过敏之前进行紧急 ROAT 以确认。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验