Suppr超能文献

评估超声测量在腕管综合征诊断和严重程度分级方面相对于电诊断的准确性。

Assessing Diagnostic and Severity Grading Accuracy of Ultrasound Measurements for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Compared to Electrodiagnostics.

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

PM R. 2021 Aug;13(8):852-861. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12533. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combined sensory index (CSI) is the most sensitive electrodiagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and the CSI and Bland criteria have been shown to predict surgical treatment outcomes. The proposed ultrasound measurements have not been assessed against the CSI for diagnostic accuracy and grading of CTS severity.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the use of ultrasound evaluations for both diagnosis and assessment of severity grading of CTS in comparison to electrodiagnostic assessment.

DESIGN

All patients underwent an electrodiagnostic evaluation using the CSI and Bland severity grading. Each patient underwent an ultrasound evaluation including cross-sectional area (CSA), the change in CSA from the forearm to the tunnel (∆CSA), and the wrist-forearm ratio (WFR). These measurements were assessed for diagnostic and severity grading accuracy using the CSI as the gold standard.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients referred for electrodiagnostic evaluation for CTS were eligible for the study. Only those with idiopathic CTS were included and those with prior CTS treatment were also excluded. Ninety-five patients were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary study outcome measure was concordance between CSI diagnosis and severity categories and the ultrasound measurements. Both outcomes were also assessed using Bland criteria.

RESULTS

Optimal cut-points for diagnosis of CTS were found to be CSA ≥12 mm , ∆CSA ≥4 mm , WFR ≥1.4. Using these cut-points, C-statistics comparing diagnosis of CTS using ultrasound measurements versus using the CSI ranged from 0.893-0.966. When looking at CSI severity grading compared to ∆CSA, however, the C-statistics were 0.640-0.661 with substantial overlap between severity groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ultrasound measurements had high diagnostic accuracy for CTS based on the CSI criteria, ultrasound measurements were unable to adequately distinguish between CSI severity groups among patients with CTS.

摘要

背景

综合感觉指数(CSI)是诊断腕管综合征(CTS)最敏感的电诊断标准,CSI 和 Bland 标准已被证明可预测手术治疗效果。尚未评估所提出的超声测量值在诊断准确性和 CTS 严重程度分级方面与 CSI 的相关性。

目的

研究超声评估在诊断和评估 CTS 严重程度分级方面与电诊断评估的对比。

设计

所有患者均接受 CSI 和 Bland 严重程度分级的电诊断评估。每位患者均接受超声评估,包括横截面积(CSA)、从前臂到手腕隧道的 CSA 变化(∆CSA)和腕部-前臂比(WFR)。以 CSI 为金标准,评估这些测量值在诊断和严重程度分级准确性方面的表现。

设置

三级学术中心。

参与者

所有因 CTS 接受电诊断评估的患者均符合研究条件。仅纳入特发性 CTS 患者,且排除既往 CTS 治疗的患者。本研究共纳入 95 例患者。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

主要研究结果是 CSI 诊断和严重程度分级与超声测量值之间的一致性。使用 Bland 标准评估这两个结果。

结果

发现 CSA≥12mm、∆CSA≥4mm、WFR≥1.4 是诊断 CTS 的最佳截断点。使用这些截断点,超声测量值与 CSI 相比诊断 CTS 的 C 统计量范围为 0.893-0.966。然而,当比较 CSI 严重程度分级与 ∆CSA 时,C 统计量为 0.640-0.661,严重程度组之间存在大量重叠。

结论

尽管超声测量值在 CSI 标准基础上对 CTS 具有较高的诊断准确性,但无法充分区分 CTS 患者的 CSI 严重程度组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验