Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
J Pain. 2021 Jun;22(6):655-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a common nonpharmacological treatment for low back pain (LBP). Although generally supported by systematic reviews and practice guidelines, clinical trials evaluating SMT have been characterized by small effect sizes. This study adopts a Multiphase Optimization Strategy framework to examine individual components of an SMT delivery protocol using a single-blind trial with the goal of identifying and optimizing a multicomponent SMT protocol. We enrolled 241 participants with LBP. All participants received 2 SMT treatment sessions in the first week then were randomly assigned additional treatment based on a fully factorial design. The 3 randomized treatment components provided in twice weekly sessions over 3 weeks were multifidus activating exercise, spinal mobilizing exercise, and additional SMT dose. Primary outcomes included clinical (Oswestry Disability Index, numeric pain intensity rating) and mechanistic (spinal stiffness, multifidus muscle activation) measures assessed at baseline, 1, 4, and 12 weeks. Significant differences were found for the Oswestry index after 12 weeks for participants receiving multifidus activating exercise (mean difference = -3.62, 97.5% CI: -6.89, -0.35; P= .01). There were no additional significant main or interaction effects for other treatment components or different outcome measures. The optimized SMT protocol identified in this study included SMT sessions followed by multifidus activating exercises. PERSPECTIVE: Optimizing the effects of nonpharmacological treatments such as SMT for LBP is challenging due to uncertainty regarding mechanisms and the complexity of multicomponent protocols. This factorial randomized trial examined SMT protocols provided with differing co-interventions with mechanistic and patient-centered outcomes. Patient-centered outcomes were optimized by inclusion of lumbar multifidus strengthening exercises.
脊柱手法治疗(SMT)是治疗下腰痛(LBP)的常用非药物治疗方法。尽管系统评价和实践指南普遍支持,但评估 SMT 的临床试验的特点是效应量较小。本研究采用多相优化策略框架,使用单盲试验检查 SMT 传递方案的各个组成部分,目的是确定和优化多成分 SMT 方案。我们招募了 241 名患有 LBP 的参与者。所有参与者在第一周内接受 2 次 SMT 治疗,然后根据完全析因设计随机分配额外的治疗。在 3 周内每周 2 次提供的 3 种随机治疗成分是多裂肌激活运动、脊柱活动运动和额外的 SMT 剂量。主要结局包括基线、1 周、4 周和 12 周时评估的临床(Oswestry 残疾指数、数字疼痛强度评分)和机制(脊柱僵硬度、多裂肌肌肉激活)指标。12 周后,接受多裂肌激活运动的参与者的 Oswestry 指数存在显著差异(平均差异= -3.62,97.5%CI:-6.89,-0.35;P=.01)。对于其他治疗成分或不同的结局测量,没有发现额外的显著主要或交互作用。本研究中确定的优化 SMT 方案包括 SMT 治疗后进行多裂肌激活运动。观点:由于对机制和多成分方案的复杂性存在不确定性,优化非药物治疗(如 SMT)治疗 LBP 的效果具有挑战性。这项析因随机试验检查了提供不同共干预措施的 SMT 方案,包括机制和以患者为中心的结局。通过纳入腰椎多裂肌强化运动来优化以患者为中心的结局。