Zeliadt Steven B, Coggeshall Scott, Gelman Hannah, Shin Marlena H, Elwy A Rani, Bokhour Barbara G, Taylor Stephanie L
Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Pain Med. 2020 Dec 12;21(Suppl 2):S100-S109. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa349.
Many health care systems are beginning to encourage patients to use complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies for pain management. Many clinicians have anecdotally reported that patients combining self-care CIH therapies with practitioner-delivered therapies report larger health improvements than do patients using practitioner-delivered or self-care CIH therapies alone. However, we are unaware of any trials in this area.
The APPROACH Study (Assessing Pain, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complementary and Integrative Health) assesses the value of veterans participating in practitioner-delivered CIH therapies alone or self-care CIH therapies alone compared with the combination of self-care and practitioner-delivered care. The study is being conducted in 18 Veterans Health Administration sites that received funding as part of the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act to expand availability of CIH therapies. Practitioner-delivered therapies under study include chiropractic care, acupuncture, and therapeutic massage, and self-care therapies include tai chi/qi gong, yoga, and meditation. The primary outcome will be improvement on the Brief Pain Inventory 6 months after initiation of CIH as compared with baseline scores. Patients will enter treatment groups on the basis of the care they receive because randomizing patients to specific CIH therapies would require withholding therapies routinely offered at VA. We will address selection bias and confounding by using sites' variations in business practices and other encouragements to receive different types of CIH therapies as a surrogate for direct randomization by using instrumental variable econometrics methods.
Real-world evidence about the value of combining self-care and practitioner-delivered CIH therapies from this pragmatic trial will help guide the VA and other health care systems in offering specific nonpharmacological approaches to manage patients' chronic pain.
许多医疗保健系统开始鼓励患者使用补充与整合健康(CIH)疗法来管理疼痛。许多临床医生有轶事报道称,将自我护理CIH疗法与从业者提供的疗法相结合的患者,比单独使用从业者提供的或自我护理CIH疗法的患者健康改善更大。然而,我们并不知晓该领域的任何试验。
APPROACH研究(评估疼痛、患者报告结局与补充与整合健康)评估退伍军人单独参与从业者提供的CIH疗法或单独参与自我护理CIH疗法,与自我护理和从业者提供的护理相结合相比的价值。该研究正在18个退伍军人健康管理局站点进行,这些站点作为《综合成瘾与康复法案》的一部分获得了资金,以扩大CIH疗法的可及性。正在研究的从业者提供的疗法包括整脊疗法、针灸和治疗性按摩,自我护理疗法包括太极拳/气功、瑜伽和冥想。主要结局将是与基线评分相比,CIH开始6个月后简明疼痛量表的改善情况。患者将根据他们接受的护理进入治疗组,因为将患者随机分配到特定的CIH疗法需要 withheld在退伍军人事务部常规提供的疗法。我们将通过使用站点在业务实践中的差异以及接受不同类型CIH疗法的其他鼓励措施,作为直接随机化的替代,采用工具变量计量经济学方法来解决选择偏倚和混杂问题。
来自这项务实试验的关于自我护理和从业者提供的CIH疗法相结合的价值的真实世界证据,将有助于指导退伍军人事务部和其他医疗保健系统提供特定的非药物方法来管理患者的慢性疼痛。