Suppr超能文献

综合补充和整合健康疗法治疗疼痛的证据强度。

Synthesizing the Strength of the Evidence of Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies for Pain.

机构信息

VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Menlo Park, California.

Stanford University, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):1831-1840. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz068.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pain and opioid use are highly prevalent, leading for calls to include nonpharmacological options in pain management, including complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies. More than 2,000 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and many systematic reviews have been conducted on CIH therapies, making it difficult to easily understand what type of CIH therapy might be effective for what type of pain. Here we synthesize the strength of the evidence for four types of CIH therapies on pain: acupuncture, therapeutic massage, mindfulness techniques, and tai chi.

DESIGN

We conducted searches of English-language systematic reviews and RCTs in 11 electronic databases and previously published reviews for each type of CIH. To synthesize that large body of literature, we then created an "evidence map," or a visual display, of the literature size and broad estimates of effectiveness for pain.

RESULTS

Many systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria: acupuncture (86), massage (38), mindfulness techniques (11), and tai chi (21). The evidence for acupuncture was strongest, and largest for headache and chronic pain. Mindfulness, massage, and tai chi have statistically significant positive effects on some types of pain. However, firm conclusions cannot be drawn for many types of pain due to methodological limitations or lack of RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is sufficient strength of evidence for acupuncture for various types of pain. Individual studies indicate that tai chi, mindfulness, and massage may be promising for multiple types of chronic pain. Additional sufficiently powered RCTs are warranted to indicate tai chi, mindfulness, and massage for other types of pain.

摘要

目的

疼痛和阿片类药物的使用非常普遍,因此需要将非药物治疗方法(包括补充和综合健康治疗)纳入疼痛管理中。已经对补充和综合健康治疗进行了超过 2000 项随机对照试验(RCT)和许多系统评价,这使得很难轻易理解哪种补充和综合健康治疗对哪种类型的疼痛可能有效。在这里,我们综合了四种补充和综合健康疗法(针灸、按摩疗法、正念技术和太极拳)对疼痛的证据强度。

设计

我们在 11 个电子数据库和每个补充和综合健康类型的先前发布的综述中进行了英语系统评价和 RCT 的搜索。为了综合大量文献,我们创建了一个“证据图谱”,即文献大小和疼痛疗效广泛估计的可视化显示。

结果

许多系统评价符合我们的纳入标准:针灸(86)、按摩(38)、正念技术(11)和太极拳(21)。针灸的证据最强,对头痛和慢性疼痛最有效。正念、按摩和太极拳对某些类型的疼痛具有统计学上显著的积极影响。然而,由于方法学上的限制或缺乏 RCT,许多类型的疼痛无法得出明确的结论。

结论

有足够的证据表明针灸对各种类型的疼痛有效。个别研究表明,太极拳、正念和按摩可能对多种类型的慢性疼痛有希望。需要进行更多足够有力的 RCT,以表明太极拳、正念和按摩对其他类型的疼痛有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验