Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Department of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Sep;7(9):1535-1545. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51115.
Few studies have captured the neuropsychological profile of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) with neuropsychological testing, and little is known about cognitive predictors of survival. We characterized baseline neuropsychological performance in sCJD and investigated associations with survival.
sCJD participants who completed the MMSE (n = 118), 61 sCJD of whom also completed a neuropsychological battery at baseline, and 135 age-matched healthy controls, were included. Composite scores of global cognition, memory, executive functions, visuospatial, and language were derived. Cox proportional hazard models estimated survival time, controlling for age and education. Additional models adjusted for Barthel Index and PRNP codon 129 polymorphism.
sCJD participants performed significantly worse than controls on all cognitive tasks and composites with most showing very large effect sizes. The three tests showing the largest group differences were delayed verbal recall (Hedges'g = 4.08, P < 0.0001), Stroop Inhibition (Hedges'g = 3.14, P < 0.0001), and Modified Trails (Hedges'g = 2.94, P < 0.0001). Memory (95%) and executive functioning (87%) composites were most commonly impaired. Poorer global (HR = 0.65, P < 0.0001), visuospatial (HR = 0.82, P < 0.0001), and memory (HR = 0.82, P = 0.01) composites predicted shorter survival. Visuospatial cognition remained a significant predictor even after adjusting for all other cognitive composites; each standard deviation decrease in visuospatial cognition was associated with an 18% higher chance of death (HR = 0.82, P < 0.003). Global (HR = 0.68, P = 0.03) and visuospatial (HR = 0.82, P = 0.001) composites remained significant predictors after controlling for Barthel Index and codon 129.
sCJD participants exhibit a broad range of cognitive impairments, with memory and executive functioning deficits in the vast majority. Neuropsychological assessment, particularly of visuospatial abilities, informs prognostication in sCJD.
很少有研究通过神经心理学测试来描述散发性克雅氏病(sCJD)的神经心理学特征,对于生存的认知预测因素也知之甚少。我们对 sCJD 的基线神经心理学表现进行了特征描述,并研究了其与生存的关系。
纳入了完成简易精神状态检查(MMSE)的 sCJD 参与者(n=118),其中 61 名 sCJD 参与者还在基线时完成了神经心理学测试,以及 135 名年龄匹配的健康对照组。得出了整体认知、记忆、执行功能、视空间和语言的综合评分。Cox 比例风险模型估计了生存时间,控制了年龄和教育程度。其他模型还调整了巴氏指数和 PRNP 密码子 129 多态性。
sCJD 参与者在所有认知任务和综合测试上的表现明显差于对照组,大多数表现出非常大的效应量。组间差异最大的三项测试是延迟语言回忆(Hedges'g=4.08,P<0.0001)、Stroop 抑制(Hedges'g=3.14,P<0.0001)和改良连线测试(Hedges'g=2.94,P<0.0001)。记忆(95%)和执行功能(87%)综合测试最常受损。较差的整体(HR=0.65,P<0.0001)、视空间(HR=0.82,P<0.0001)和记忆(HR=0.82,P=0.01)综合测试预测生存时间较短。即使在调整了所有其他认知综合测试后,视空间认知仍然是一个显著的预测因素;视空间认知每降低一个标准差,死亡的几率就会增加 18%(HR=0.82,P<0.003)。在控制了巴氏指数和密码子 129 后,整体(HR=0.68,P=0.03)和视空间(HR=0.82,P=0.001)综合测试仍然是显著的预测因素。
sCJD 参与者表现出广泛的认知障碍,绝大多数存在记忆和执行功能缺陷。神经心理学评估,特别是视空间能力评估,为 sCJD 的预后提供了信息。