• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每周一次司美格鲁肽与其他 GLP-1 受体激动剂在 2 型糖尿病中的成本效益比较:系统文献回顾。

The cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide compared with other GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 Diabetes: a systematic literature review.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China.

Pharmacy Practice & Administrative Sciences, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Apr;21(2):221-233. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1860022. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2021.1860022
PMID:33317348
Abstract

: As a novel glucagon-like peptide-1receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment, the economic value of once-weekly semaglutide had been assessed in several country settings. The authors' objective was to systematically review the existing pharmacoeconomic literature evaluating the cost-effectiveness associated with once-weekly semaglutide compared with other GLP-1 RAs and provide implications for further researches.: We conducted a systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) published up to 25 July 2020 in PubMed, web of science, and the ISPOR presentation database, compared once-weekly semaglutide with other GLP-1 RAs in T2D. Nineteen studies were identified, including 8 short-term and 11 long-term studies. General characteristics and main results of the included studies were summarized.: This review provided references for other countries to overview the value of once-weekly semaglutide compared with other GLP-1 RAs in T2D in the healthcare decision-making process and to conduct their CEA studies associated with once-weekly semaglutide. The authors found that the cardiovascular (CV) benefit of once-weekly semaglutide was under-estimated in current studies and suggested that the methods of economic evaluations for novel anti-diabetic drugs with CV benefit should be improved in future researches.

摘要

作为一种新型的胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA),用于治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2D),每周一次司美格鲁肽的经济学价值已在多个国家进行了评估。作者的目的是系统地回顾现有的药物经济学文献,评估每周一次司美格鲁肽与其他 GLP-1RA 相比的成本效益,并为进一步的研究提供启示。

我们在 PubMed、web of science 和 ISPOR 演示数据库中,对截至 2020 年 7 月 25 日发表的成本效益分析(CEA)进行了系统的文献回顾,比较了每周一次司美格鲁肽与 T2D 中的其他 GLP-1RA。确定了 19 项研究,包括 8 项短期研究和 11 项长期研究。总结了纳入研究的一般特征和主要结果。

这项综述为其他国家在医疗保健决策过程中,概述每周一次司美格鲁肽与其他 GLP-1RA 在 T2D 中的相对价值提供了参考,并开展了与每周一次司美格鲁肽相关的 CEA 研究。作者发现,目前的研究低估了每周一次司美格鲁肽的心血管(CV)获益,并建议在未来的研究中改进具有 CV 获益的新型抗糖尿病药物的经济评估方法。

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide compared with other GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 Diabetes: a systematic literature review.每周一次司美格鲁肽与其他 GLP-1 受体激动剂在 2 型糖尿病中的成本效益比较:系统文献回顾。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Apr;21(2):221-233. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1860022. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia.在斯洛伐克,每周一次司美格鲁肽与每周一次度拉鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病的管理:一项长期成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2034-2051. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
3
Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Daily Liraglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the UK.评估每周一次司美格鲁肽与每日一次利拉鲁肽治疗英国 2 型糖尿病的长期成本效益。
Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2427-2441. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01337-7. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
4
Oral semaglutide versus injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a cost of control analysis.口服司美格鲁肽与注射用胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂:控制成本分析。
J Med Econ. 2020 Jun;23(6):650-658. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1722678. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
Cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide and lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control in Sweden.每周一次司美格鲁肽对比每周两次度拉鲁肽和利西那肽治疗血糖控制不佳的瑞典 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2019 Oct;22(10):997-1005. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1614009. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Cardiovascular safety outcomes of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者使用每周一次胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的心血管安全性结局
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Sep;45 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):61-72. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13226.
7
Sgemaglutide in type 2 diabetes - is it the best glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1R agonist)?司美格鲁肽用于2型糖尿病——它是最佳的胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1R激动剂)吗?
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018 Mar;14(3):371-377. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1441286. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Managing the multifaceted nature of type 2 diabetes using once-weekly injectable GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy.采用每周一次注射 GLP-1 受体激动剂治疗管理 2 型糖尿病的多方面特性。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Sep;45 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7-16. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13229.
9
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a once-weekly GLP-1 analogue versus an SGLT-2 inhibitor in the Spanish setting: Once-weekly semaglutide versus empagliflozin.评估每周一次 GLP-1 类似物与 SGLT-2 抑制剂在西班牙环境中的成本效益:每周一次司美格鲁肽与恩格列净。
J Med Econ. 2020 Feb;23(2):193-203. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1681436. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Glycaemic and non-glycaemic efficacy of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes.每周一次的胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病患者的血糖及非血糖疗效
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Sep;45 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):28-42. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13224.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Semaglutide Compared With Other Glucose-Lowering Medications in Treating Type 2 Diabetes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.司美格鲁肽与其他降糖药物治疗2型糖尿病的成本效益:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jun 1;48(6):1032-1041. doi: 10.2337/dc24-2241.
2
Cost consequence analysis of adding semaglutide to treatment regimen for patients with Type II diabetes in Saudi Arabia.在沙特阿拉伯,为2型糖尿病患者的治疗方案添加司美格鲁肽的成本效益分析。
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 May;32(5):102057. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102057. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
3
Tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg vs semaglutide 2.0 mg: A long-term cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States.
替尔泊肽 10 毫克和 15 毫克与司美格鲁肽 2.0 毫克治疗美国 2 型糖尿病患者的长期成本效益分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Feb 3;30(2):153-162. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.153.
4
Glycemic Control, Weight Management, Cardiovascular Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of Semaglutide for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Rapid Review and Meta-analysis of Real-World Studies.司美格鲁肽用于2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制、体重管理、心血管安全性及成本效益:真实世界研究的快速回顾与荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Feb;15(2):497-519. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01520-3. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
5
The long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg vs. dulaglutide 3 mg and 4.5 mg in the UK.英国每周一次司美格鲁肽 1 毫克与每周一次度拉鲁肽 3 毫克和 4.5 毫克的长期成本效益比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Aug;24(6):895-907. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01514-1. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
6
Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Once-Weekly Semaglutide versus Dulaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with Inadequate Glycemic Control in China.在中国血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次司美格鲁肽与度拉糖肽的长期成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2022 Oct;13(10):1737-1753. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01301-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8.