University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
University of New Hampshire, Durham, NC, USA.
J Child Sex Abus. 2021 Feb-Mar;30(2):167-191. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2020.1856994. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
Cross-agency collaboration for responding to child abuse cases is critical for the safety and wellbeing of children. However, working effectively across organizational boundaries can be difficult, especially where there are considerable disciplinary differences. Accordingly, many jurisdictions have put in place policies and processes to support cross-agency collaboration across groups responding to severe child abuse. The aim of this scoping review was to highlight key factors that may influence the quality of cross-agency collaboration in severe child abuse cases. A systematic search comprising 57 empirical studies examining the facilitators and/or barriers to cross-agency collaboration in child abuse cases was undertaken identifying eleven factors. This review found the most commonly cited factor was the need to reconcile the different roles/mandates of workers with their roles in a cross-agency response. A clear cross-agency protocol that establishes agreed procedures was also a commonly cited factor, along with cross-agency training, and communication and information sharing practices. This scoping review highlighted the lack of high-quality evidence that could be used to assess the effectiveness of policies and processes to support cross-agency collaboration for child abuse cases, and targeted areas for future research to enhance the quality of evidence for this common type of program/intervention.
跨机构合作对于处理虐待儿童案件至关重要,这关乎儿童的安全和福祉。然而,在组织边界内进行有效合作可能具有挑战性,特别是在存在相当大的学科差异的情况下。因此,许多司法管辖区已经制定了政策和流程,以支持对严重虐待儿童案件做出回应的各个团体之间的跨机构合作。本范围审查旨在强调可能影响严重虐待儿童案件中跨机构合作质量的关键因素。进行了一项系统搜索,其中包括 57 项研究,以检查在儿童虐待案件中促进和/或阻碍跨机构合作的因素,确定了 11 个因素。本审查发现,最常被引用的因素是需要协调工作人员的不同角色/任务与其在跨机构应对中的角色。明确的跨机构协议,规定了商定的程序,也是一个常见的因素,以及跨机构培训,以及沟通和信息共享做法。本范围审查强调了缺乏高质量证据,无法用于评估支持虐待儿童案件跨机构合作的政策和流程的有效性,并确定了未来研究的重点领域,以提高这种常见类型的计划/干预措施的证据质量。