Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;77(4):1068-1089. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23098. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
The current study sought to empirically evaluate a new clinical tool, the Individual Beliefs about Emotion (IBAE) which assesses nine beliefs about emotion. The goal was to examine the overlap of the IBAE with the Leahy Emotional Schema Scale (LESS), indices of psychopathology, and emotion dysregulation.
Participants (n = 513) completed the IBAE, the LESS, and measures of affective distress, borderline personality features, and emotion dysregulation.
Results indicated that both emotion beliefs (IBAE) and schemas (LESS) were influenced by age and gender. Both measures significantly predicted variance in affective distress, borderline symptoms, and emotion dysregulation, although the LESS was a stronger predictor.
We conclude that the LESS total score is a particularly useful measure of maladaptive schematic attitudes toward emotion, with additional evidence that the IBAE is a clinical tool that can be useful in psychotherapy to quickly assess a variety of emotion beliefs.
本研究旨在对一种新的临床工具,即个体情绪信念量表(IBAE)进行实证评估,该量表评估了关于情绪的九个信念。目的是检查 IBAE 与 Leahy 情绪图式量表(LESS)、精神病理学指标和情绪失调的重叠。
参与者(n=513)完成了 IBAE、LESS 和情感困扰、边缘型人格特征以及情绪失调的测量。
结果表明,情绪信念(IBAE)和图式(LESS)都受到年龄和性别的影响。这两个量表都显著预测了情感困扰、边缘症状和情绪失调的差异,但 LESS 是一个更强的预测指标。
我们得出结论,LESS 总分是一种特别有用的衡量对情绪的适应不良图式态度的指标,此外还有证据表明,IBAE 是一种临床工具,可在心理治疗中快速评估各种情绪信念。