• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下颈内静脉置管时动态针尖定位与传统长轴平面内技术的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of dynamic needle tip positioning versus conventional long-axis in-plane techniques for ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Mar;87(3):294-301. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14734-5. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

DOI:10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14734-5
PMID:33319947
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous visualization of the needle tip is essential for successful ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization, and the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique enables it. The aim of this randomized, dual-center trial was to compare the first-attempt success rate of ultrasound-guided internal jugular catheterization between the DNTP and conventional long-axis in-plane (LAX-IP) techniques.

METHODS

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery at two tertiary teaching hospitals were randomly allocated to either the DNTP or LAX-IP group. Internal jugular venous catheterization was performed by four anesthesiologists. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of central venous catheterization. Procedural time and complications related to catheterization were compared as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 142 patients were analysed. The first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in the DNTP group (59/72, 81.9%) than in the LAX-IP group (46/70, 65.7%; odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval 1.09-5.15; P=0.028). In addition, the needle was redirected less frequently in the DNTP group than the LAX-IP group (P=0.026). Procedural time was comparable between the groups. No significant differences were observed in complications related to catheterization, including posterior wall puncture, carotid artery puncture, or hematoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The DNTP technique resulted in a significantly higher success rate on the first attempt at internal jugular venous catheterization and required less frequent redirection of the needle during the procedure than the conventional LAX-IP technique.

摘要

背景

成功的超声引导下中心静脉置管需要持续可视化针尖,而动态针尖定位(DNTP)技术可实现这一点。本随机、双中心试验的目的是比较 DNTP 与传统长轴平面内(LAX-IP)技术在超声引导下颈内静脉置管中的首次尝试成功率。

方法

在两家三级教学医院接受心脏手术的患者被随机分配到 DNTP 或 LAX-IP 组。由四名麻醉师进行颈内静脉置管。主要结局是中心静脉置管的首次尝试成功率。次要结局比较了操作时间和与置管相关的并发症。

结果

共分析了 142 例患者。DNTP 组的首次尝试成功率(59/72,81.9%)明显高于 LAX-IP 组(46/70,65.7%;优势比,2.37;95%置信区间 1.09-5.15;P=0.028)。此外,DNTP 组针尖重新定向的频率明显低于 LAX-IP 组(P=0.026)。两组的操作时间无显著差异。与置管相关的并发症(包括后壁穿刺、颈动脉穿刺或血肿)无显著差异。

结论

DNTP 技术可显著提高颈内静脉置管的首次尝试成功率,且在操作过程中针尖重新定向的频率低于传统的 LAX-IP 技术。

相似文献

1
Comparison of dynamic needle tip positioning versus conventional long-axis in-plane techniques for ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization: a randomized controlled trial.超声引导下颈内静脉置管时动态针尖定位与传统长轴平面内技术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Mar;87(3):294-301. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14734-5. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
2
Ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation using dynamic needle tip positioning versus conventional long-axis in-plane techniques in cardiac surgery patients: a randomized, controlled trial.心脏手术患者中使用动态针尖定位与传统长轴平面内技术进行超声引导桡动脉置管的随机对照试验
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Jan;86(1):30-37. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13646-2. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Ultrasound guidance for internal jugular vein cannulation in neonates: Modified dynamic needle tip positioning short-axis out-of-plane technique versus long-axis in-plane technique, a randomized controlled trial.新生儿颈内静脉置管的超声引导:改良动态针尖定位短轴平面外技术与长轴平面内技术的随机对照试验
J Vasc Access. 2022 Nov;23(6):922-929. doi: 10.1177/11297298211015043. Epub 2021 May 16.
4
Combined short- and long-axis method for internal jugular vein catheterization in premature newborns: A randomized controlled trial.经胸超声引导下联合短轴和长轴切面法在早产儿颈内静脉置管中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Mar;65(3):420-427. doi: 10.1111/aas.13728. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
5
Randomized comparison of three transducer orientation approaches for ultrasound guided internal jugular venous cannulation.随机比较三种超声引导下颈内静脉置管探头方位方法。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Mar;116(3):370-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev399. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
6
Effect of the bevel direction of puncture needle on success rate and complications during internal jugular vein catheterization.穿刺针斜面方向对内颈静脉置管成功率和并发症的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):491-4. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da48.
7
Ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access: comparison between short axis and long axis techniques.超声引导下颈内静脉穿刺:短轴与长轴技术的比较
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2013 Jul;24(4):707-13. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.113861.
8
Long-Axis In-Plane Approach Versus Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下儿科患者中心静脉置管的长轴平面内入路与短轴平面外入路的随机对照试验。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;21(11):e996-e1001. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002476.
9
Long-axis in-plane combined with short-axis out-of-plane technique in ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization in infants: A randomized controlled trial.婴儿超声引导动脉置管中长轴平面内联合短轴平面外技术:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Anesth. 2023 May;85:111038. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.111038. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Combined Approach Versus 2 Conventional Approaches in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下中心静脉置管的联合方法与 2 种传统方法的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Nov;33(11):2979-2984. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.051. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Study Comparing Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Using Two Techniques: Short-Axis Out-of-Plane With Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Versus Long-Axis In-Plane.一项比较两种技术进行超声引导下颈内静脉置管的随机研究:短轴平面外动态针尖定位技术与长轴平面内技术。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 23;16(6):e63004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63004. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Comparison of the scan-as-you-go technique with the short-axis out-of-plane technique on the incidence of posterior venous wall puncture in ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation - A randomised controlled trial.超声引导下颈内静脉置管中即扫即针法与短轴平面外法对后静脉壁穿刺发生率的比较——一项随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Apr;68(4):387-390. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_990_23. Epub 2024 Mar 13.