Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcala, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Dig Endosc. 2021 Nov;33(7):1093-1100. doi: 10.1111/den.13914. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
Endocytoscopy (EC) is an ultra-high magnification endoscopy designed to provide in vivo histologic assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of the newly developed fourth-generation EC for esophageal squamous lesions by using a modified EC classification.
A total of 2548 EC images of 57 esophageal targeted areas between June 2015 and October 2017 were retrospectively collected. Two lesions with low-quality images were excluded. Only EC images were independently reviewed by two expert and two non-expert endoscopists. The lesions were classified according to a three-tier modified EC classification. We used a multilevel logistic regression to analyze the data.
The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing non-squamous cell cancer (SCC) vs SCC were 82.5% and 83.0% by the experts; 90.1% and 75.0% by non-experts. The interobserver agreement among the four raters was good (kappa statistic 0.59). The diagnostic accuracy of experts and non-experts was similar (P = 0.16 for specificity and P = 0.20 for sensitivity). The sensitivity and specificity of EC for non-neoplasia vs neoplasia were 88.7% and 74.6% by experts; 90.3 and 52.1% by non-experts. The interobserver agreement among the four raters was moderate (kappa statistic 0.44). The specificity of experts was higher compared to non-experts, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.08 for specificity and P = 0.93 for sensitivity).
Fourth-generation EC offers acceptable diagnostic accuracy and reliability in both experts and non-experts, especially when diagnosing SCC lesions.
内镜下细胞学检查(EC)是一种超高倍放大内镜,旨在提供体内组织学评估。本研究旨在通过改良的 EC 分类评估第四代 EC 对食管鳞状病变的诊断效果。
回顾性收集 2015 年 6 月至 2017 年 10 月期间 57 个食管靶向区域的 2548 张 EC 图像。排除 2 张图像质量差的病变。仅由 2 名专家和 2 名非专家内镜医生独立对 EC 图像进行复查。病变根据改良的 EC 三级分类进行分类。我们采用多水平逻辑回归分析数据。
专家诊断非鳞状细胞癌(SCC)与 SCC 的灵敏度和特异度分别为 82.5%和 83.0%;非专家分别为 90.1%和 75.0%。四位观察者之间的观察者间一致性良好(kappa 统计量 0.59)。专家和非专家的诊断准确性相似(特异性 P=0.16,敏感性 P=0.20)。EC 对非肿瘤与肿瘤的诊断灵敏度和特异度分别为专家 88.7%和 74.6%;非专家为 90.3%和 52.1%。四位观察者之间的观察者间一致性为中度(kappa 统计量 0.44)。与非专家相比,专家的特异性更高,但差异无统计学意义(特异性 P=0.08,敏感性 P=0.93)。
第四代 EC 在专家和非专家中均具有可接受的诊断准确性和可靠性,尤其在诊断 SCC 病变时。