Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA,
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Cardiorenal Med. 2021;11(1):44-51. doi: 10.1159/000510402. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is emerging as an important noninvasive testing modality for coronary angiography. The performance characteristic of CCTA in patients with advanced kidney disease is unknown.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies specifically investigating the sensitivity and specificity of CCTA compared to coronary angiogram as a reference standard in patients with advanced kidney disease, defined as dialysis dependence or nearing kidney transplantation. Two independent investigators assessed studies for inclusion/exclusion, quality, and characteristics, while a third investigator adjudicated.
We identified 4 studies including a total of 217 patients, of whom 159 were dialysis dependent. Three of the 4 studies had a high risk of bias in patient selection and study flow, while 1 study rated low in all areas of bias. The studies were heterogeneous in their patient selection and CCTA protocol but consistent in their definition of obstructive coronary artery disease. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for CCTA were 0.96 (0.87-0.99) and 0.66 (0.57-0.74), respectively. When we restricted the analysis to dialysis-dependent patients, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for CCTA were 0.99 (0.74-1.00) and 0.67 (0.49-0.82), respectively.
Based on limited data, CCTA appears to have comparable sensitivity but lower specificity relative to the non-kidney disease population.
冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)作为一种重要的冠状动脉造影非侵入性检测手段正在兴起。在晚期肾病患者中,CCTA 的性能特征尚不清楚。
我们对专门研究 CCTA 与冠状动脉造影作为参考标准的敏感性和特异性的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,晚期肾病患者的定义为透析依赖或接近肾移植。两名独立的调查员评估研究的纳入/排除、质量和特征,而第三名调查员则进行裁决。
我们确定了 4 项研究,共纳入 217 名患者,其中 159 名患者依赖透析。这 4 项研究中有 3 项在患者选择和研究流程方面存在高偏倚风险,而 1 项研究在所有偏倚领域的评分均较低。这些研究在患者选择和 CCTA 方案方面存在异质性,但在阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的定义上是一致的。CCTA 的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 0.96(0.87-0.99)和 0.66(0.57-0.74)。当我们将分析限制在依赖透析的患者中时,CCTA 的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 0.99(0.74-1.00)和 0.67(0.49-0.82)。
基于有限的数据,CCTA 似乎具有与非肾病患者群体相当的敏感性,但特异性较低。