Dept. of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dept. of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;47(3 Pt B):708-716. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.145. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
First, this study aimed to assess the prognostic value of different definitions for resection margin status on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Second, preoperative predictors of direct margin involvement were identified.
This nationwide observational cohort study included all patients who underwent upfront PDAC resection (2014-2016), as registered in the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. Patients were subdivided into three groups: R0 (≥1 mm margin clearance), R1 (<1 mm margin clearance) or R1 (direct margin involvement). Survival was compared using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Logistic regression with baseline variables was performed to identify preoperative predictors of R1 (direct).
595 patients with a median OS of 18 months (IQR 10-32 months) months were analysed. R0 (≥1 mm) was achieved in 277 patients (47%), R1 (<1 mm) in 146 patients (24%) and R1 (direct) in 172 patients (29%). R1 (direct) was associated with a worse OS, as compared with both R0 (≥1 mm) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.35 [95% and confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.70); P < 0.01) and R1 (<1 mm) (HR 1.29 [95%CI 1.01-1.67]; P < 0.05). No OS difference was found between R0 (≥1 mm) and R1 (<1 mm) (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.82-1.34]; P = 0.71). Preoperative predictors associated with an increased risk of R1 (direct) included age, male sex, performance score 2-4, and venous or arterial tumour involvement.
Resection margin clearance of <1 mm, but without direct margin involvement, does not affect survival, as compared with a margin clearance of ≥1 mm. Given that any vascular tumour involvement on preoperative imaging was associated with an increased risk of R1 (direct) resection with upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy might be considered in these patients.
首先,本研究旨在评估不同切缘状态定义对胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)的预后价值。其次,确定术前直接切缘受累的预测因素。
本项全国性观察性队列研究纳入了所有在荷兰前瞻性胰腺癌症审计中登记的 2014-2016 年接受 PDAC 切除术的患者。患者被分为三组:R0(≥1mm 切缘清除)、R1(<1mm 切缘清除)或 R1(直接切缘受累)。采用多变量 Cox 回归分析比较生存情况。采用基于基线变量的逻辑回归确定 R1(直接)的术前预测因素。
对 595 名中位 OS 为 18 个月(IQR 10-32 个月)的患者进行了分析。277 名患者(47%)达到 R0(≥1mm),146 名患者(24%)为 R1(<1mm),172 名患者(29%)为 R1(直接)。与 R0(≥1mm)(危险比(HR)1.35[95%置信区间(CI)1.08-1.70];P<0.01)和 R1(<1mm)(HR 1.29[95%CI 1.01-1.67];P<0.05)相比,R1(直接)与更差的 OS 相关。在 R0(≥1mm)和 R1(<1mm)之间未发现 OS 差异(HR 1.05[95%CI 0.82-1.34];P=0.71)。与 R1(直接)风险增加相关的术前预测因素包括年龄、男性、表现评分 2-4 分以及静脉或动脉肿瘤累及。
与切缘清除≥1mm 相比,<1mm 但无直接切缘受累并不影响生存。鉴于术前影像学检查中任何血管肿瘤受累与直接切缘受累的 R1 切除术风险增加相关,这些患者可能需要新辅助治疗。