Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
CIBERONC, Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Jun;56(6):1272-1280. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-01162-0. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
We retrospectively compared outcomes of a large series of adult patients with APL in CR2 receiving alloHSCT (n = 228) or autoHSCT (n = 341) reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation from January 2004 to December 2018. The 2-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was significantly higher for alloHSCT 17.3% (95% CI 12.5-22.8) compared with autoHSCT 2.7% (95% CI 1.2-5) (p = 0.001), while differences in relapse rate were not significant (28% versus 22.9%; p = 0.28). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) favored autoHSCT with 74.5% (95% CI 69-79.2) and 82.4% (95% CI 77.3-86.5) compared with alloHSCT with 54.7% (95% CI 47.5-61.3) (p = 0.001) and 64.3% (95% CI 57.2-70.6), respectively (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed significantly worse LFS after alloHSCT (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.37-0.67; p < 0.0001), older age (p = 0.001), and shorter time from diagnosis to transplant (p = 0.00015). Similar results were obtained for OS. The study shows that autoHSCT resulted in better survival outcomes (LFS and OS) for APL in CR2. These results were mainly due to reduced NRM in the autoHSCT as compared to alloHSCT.
我们回顾性比较了 2004 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间向欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会报告的 228 例成人 APL 在 CR2 接受alloHSCT 和 341 例接受 autoHSCT 的患者的结果。alloHSCT 的 2 年非复发死亡率为 17.3%(95%CI 12.5-22.8),明显高于 autoHSCT 的 2.7%(95%CI 1.2-5)(p=0.001),而复发率差异无统计学意义(28%比 22.9%;p=0.28)。白血病无复发生存(LFS)和总生存(OS)有利于 autoHSCT,分别为 74.5%(95%CI 69-79.2)和 82.4%(95%CI 77.3-86.5),alloHSCT 为 54.7%(95%CI 47.5-61.3)(p=0.001)和 64.3%(95%CI 57.2-70.6)(p=0.001 和 p=0.001)。多变量分析显示 alloHSCT 后 LFS 显著较差(HR 0.49;95%CI 0.37-0.67;p<0.0001),年龄较大(p=0.001),诊断至移植时间较短(p=0.00015)。OS 也得到了类似的结果。该研究表明,对于 APL 在 CR2,autoHSCT 可带来更好的生存结果(LFS 和 OS)。这些结果主要归因于与 alloHSCT 相比,autoHSCT 的 NRMs 降低。