Zou Liqing, Guo Tiantian, Ye Luxi, Zhou Yue, Chu Li, Chu Xiao, Ni Jianjiao, Zhu Zhengfei, Yang Xi
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 26;10:572462. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.572462. eCollection 2020.
Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) is commonly classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Even for stage I disease, after surgery the survival is always poor, but clinical research on LCNEC is scant and always with unsatisfying sample sizes. Thus, we conduct the first study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to compare survival after surgery between stage I LCNEC and other types of NSCLC.
From 2004 to 2016, 473 patients with stage IA LCNEC, 17,669 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and 8,475 patients with lung squamous cell cancer (LSCC), all treated with surgery were identified. In addition, 1:1 PSM was used, and overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between groups were compared.
The 5-year OS rates and CSS rates for LCNEC were 52.5% and 81.5%, respectively. Overall, both OS and CSS were significantly superior for stage IA LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.636, 95% CI 0.568-0.712; for CSS: HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.561-0.842, LCNEC as reference), while comparable for LSCC with LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.869-1.091; for CSS: HR 0.907, 95% CI 0.738-1.115). PSM generated 471 pairs when LCNEC was compared with LADC and both OS and CSS were significantly better in LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.580, 95% CI 0.491-0.686; for CSS: HR 0.602, 95% CI 0.446-0.814). Of note, for the subgroup of patients ≤ 65 years old, HRs for both OS and CSS were lower (for OS: HR 0.470; for CSS: HR 0.482). As for comparison between LCNEC and LSCC, PSM generated 470 pairs. Differently, only CSS was significantly superior in LSCC than LCNEC (HR 0.563, 95% CI 0.392-0.807), while OS was not. Further grouping by age showed only CSS between two groups for patients with age ≤ 65 years old was significantly different (P = 0.006).
We report the first survival comparison after surgery between stage IA LCNEC and other types of NSCLC by SEER database and PSM. Our results demonstrated after surgery, stage IA LCNEC was worse in survival, especially compared to LADC. Extra clinical care should be paid, especially for younger patients. More studies investigating adjuvant therapy are warranted.
肺大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)通常被归类为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。即使是I期疾病,手术后的生存率也一直很差,但关于LCNEC的临床研究很少,而且样本量总是不尽人意。因此,我们开展了第一项使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究,以比较I期LCNEC与其他类型NSCLC手术后的生存率。
确定了2004年至2016年期间接受手术治疗的473例IA期LCNEC患者、17669例肺腺癌(LADC)患者和8475例肺鳞状细胞癌(LSCC)患者。此外,采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM),并比较了各组之间的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。
LCNEC的5年OS率和CSS率分别为52.5%和81.5%。总体而言,IA期LADC的OS和CSS均显著优于LCNEC(OS:风险比[HR]0.636,95%置信区间[CI]0.568-0.712;CSS:HR 0.688,95%CI 0.561-0.842,以LCNEC为参照),而LSCC与LCNEC相当(OS:HR 0.974,95%CI 0.869-1.091;CSS:HR 0.907,95%CI 0.738-1.115)。当LCNEC与LADC进行比较时,PSM产生了471对匹配病例,LADC的OS和CSS均显著优于LCNEC(OS:HR 0.580,95%CI 0.491-0.686;CSS:HR 0.602,95%CI 0.446-0.814)。值得注意的是,对于年龄≤65岁的患者亚组,OS和CSS的HR均较低(OS:HR 0.470;CSS:HR 0.482)。至于LCNEC与LSCC的比较,PSM产生了470对匹配病例。不同的是, 只有CSS在LSCC中显著优于LCNEC(HR 0.563,95%CI 0.392-0.807),而OS并非如此。按年龄进一步分组显示,年龄≤65岁患者两组之间只有CSS存在显著差异(P = 0.006)。
我们通过SEER数据库和PSM首次报告了IA期LCNEC与其他类型NSCLC手术后的生存比较。我们的结果表明,手术后IA期LCNEC的生存率较差,尤其是与LADC相比。应给予额外的临床护理,尤其是对年轻患者。有必要开展更多关于辅助治疗的研究。