Department of Cell Biology and Immunology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Department of Hematology and Transplantology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Front Immunol. 2020 Nov 19;11:584509. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584509. eCollection 2020.
Rituximab is a pioneering anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that became the first-line drug used in immunotherapy of B-cell malignancies over the last twenty years. Rituximab activates the complement system , but there is an ongoing debate on the exact role of this effector mechanism in therapeutic effect. Results of both and studies are model-dependent and preclude clear clinical conclusions. Additional confounding factors like complement inhibition by tumor cells, loss of target antigen and complement depletion due to excessively applied immunotherapeutics, intrapersonal variability in the concentration of main complement components and differences in tumor burden all suggest that a personalized approach is the best strategy for optimization of rituximab dosage and therapeutic schedule. Herein we critically review the existing knowledge in support of such concept and present original data on markers of complement activation, complement consumption, and rituximab accumulation in plasma of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). The increase of markers such as C4d and terminal complement complex (TCC) suggest the strongest complement activation after the first administration of rituximab, but not indicative of clinical outcome in patients receiving rituximab in combination with chemotherapy. Both ELISA and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) functional assay showed that a substantial number of patients accumulate rituximab to the extent that consecutive infusions do not improve the cytotoxic capacity of their sera. Our data suggest that individual assessment of CDC activity and rituximab concentration in plasma may support clinicians' decisions on further drug infusions, or instead prescribing a therapy with anti-CD20 antibodies like obinutuzumab that more efficiently activate effector mechanisms other than complement.
利妥昔单抗是一种开创性的抗 CD20 单克隆抗体,在过去 20 年中成为 B 细胞恶性肿瘤免疫治疗的一线药物。利妥昔单抗激活补体系统,但关于该效应机制在治疗效果中的确切作用仍存在争议。两者的研究结果均依赖于模型,无法得出明确的临床结论。其他混杂因素,如肿瘤细胞对补体的抑制、靶抗原的丢失以及由于过度应用免疫治疗而导致的补体耗竭、主要补体成分浓度的个体内变异性以及肿瘤负担的差异,都表明个性化方法是优化利妥昔单抗剂量和治疗方案的最佳策略。在此,我们批判性地回顾了支持这一概念的现有知识,并提出了关于慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者血浆中补体激活标志物、补体消耗和利妥昔单抗积累的原始数据。C4d 和末端补体复合物(TCC)等标志物的增加表明利妥昔单抗首次给药后补体激活最强,但不能指示接受利妥昔单抗联合化疗的患者的临床结局。ELISA 和补体依赖性细胞毒性(CDC)功能测定均表明,相当数量的患者积累了利妥昔单抗,以至于连续输注并不能提高其血清的细胞毒性。我们的数据表明,对 CDC 活性和血浆中利妥昔单抗浓度进行个体评估可能支持临床医生关于进一步药物输注的决策,或者替代使用奥滨尤妥珠单抗等抗 CD20 抗体的治疗,这些抗体更有效地激活补体以外的效应机制。