Huang Da, Yang Xiaoqun, Wu Yishuo, Lin Xiaoling, Xu Danfeng, Na Rong, Xu Jianfeng
Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 24;10:565382. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.565382. eCollection 2020.
Clinical studies have suggested that prostate health index () outperforms prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests in prostate cancer detection. The cost-effectiveness of with different cutoffs is poorly understood in the context of decision making for prostate biopsy.
In a multicenter cohort, 3,348 men with elevated total PSA (tPSA) underwent initial prostate biopsy from August 2013 to May 2019. We constructed a decision model to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of different cutoffs. Total costs and reimbursement payments were based on the fee schedule of Shanghai Basic Medical Insurance and converted into United States dollars ($). Two willingness-to-pay thresholds were estimated as one or three times the average gross domestic product per capita of China ($7,760 or $23,279, respectively).
The total costs of prostate biopsy and PSA tests were estimated at $315 and $19, respectively. The cost of test varied between $72 to $130 in different medical centers. Under different cutoffs (from 23 to 35), test predicted reductions of 420 (21.7%) to 972 (50.2%) in unnecessary biopsies, with a total gain of 23.77-57.58 quality adjusted life-years compared to PSA tests. All the cutoffs would be cost-effective for patients with tPSA levels of 2-10 ng/ml. Applying 27 as the cutoff was cost-effective for each tPSA range, with missing positive cases ranging from 11 (3.4%) to 33 (11.5%).
Using test was cost-effective in the decision-making process for initial prostate biopsy, especially for patients with tPSA values between 2-10 ng/ml. The cutoff of 27 was cost-effective regardless of tPSA ranges and should be recommended from a health-economic perspective.
临床研究表明,前列腺健康指数(PHI)在前列腺癌检测方面优于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测。在前列腺活检决策背景下,不同临界值的PHI的成本效益尚不清楚。
在一个多中心队列中,2013年8月至2019年5月,3348名总PSA(tPSA)升高的男性接受了初次前列腺活检。我们构建了一个决策模型来评估不同PHI临界值的增量成本效益比。总成本和报销费用基于上海基本医疗保险的收费标准,并换算成美元($)。估计了两个支付意愿阈值,分别为中国人均国内生产总值的一倍或三倍(分别为7760美元或23279美元)。
前列腺活检和PSA检测的总成本估计分别为315美元和19美元。不同医疗中心的PHI检测成本在72美元至130美元之间。在不同的PHI临界值(从23到35)下,PHI检测预计可减少420例(21.7%)至972例(50.2%)不必要的活检,与PSA检测相比,总共可获得23.77 - 57.58个质量调整生命年。所有临界值对于tPSA水平为2 - 10 ng/ml的患者都具有成本效益。将27作为临界值对于每个tPSA范围都具有成本效益,漏诊阳性病例数从11例(3.4%)到33例(11.5%)不等。
在初次前列腺活检的决策过程中,使用PHI检测具有成本效益,特别是对于tPSA值在2 - 10 ng/ml之间的患者。无论tPSA范围如何,27的PHI临界值都具有成本效益,从健康经济学角度应予以推荐。