Suppr超能文献

单发脑转移瘤切除术后局部照射与全脑照射的前瞻性随机单中心试验

Sector Irradiation vs. Whole Brain Irradiation After Resection of Singular Brain Metastasis-A Prospective Randomized Monocentric Trial.

作者信息

Kerschbaumer Johannes, Pinggera Daniel, Holzner Bernhard, Delazer Margarete, Bodner Thomas, Karner Elfriede, Dostal Lucie, Kvitsaridze Irma, Minasch Danijela, Thomé Claudius, Seiz-Rosenhagen Marcel, Nevinny-Stickel Meinhard, Freyschlag Christian F

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

University Clinic for Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 24;10:591884. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.591884. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

To minimize recurrence following resection of a cerebral metastasis, whole-brain irradiation therapy (WBRT) has been established as the adjuvant standard of care. With prolonged overall survival in cancer patients, deleterious effects of WBRT gain relevance. Sector irradiation (SR) aims to spare uninvolved brain tissue by applying the irradiation to the resection cavity and the tumor bed. 40 were randomized to receive either WBRT (n = 18) or SR (n = 22) following resection of a singular brain metastasis. Local tumor control was satisfactory in both groups. Recurrence was observed earlier in the SR (median 3 months, 1-6) than in the WBRT cohort (median 8 months, 7-9) (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.03-10.62). Seventeen patients experienced a distant intracranial recurrence. Most relapses (n = 15) occurred in the SR cohort, whereas only two patients in the WBRT group had new distant tumor manifestation (HR, 6.59; 95% CI, 1.71-11.49; p = 0.002). Median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months (range: 1-61) with longer OS in the SR group (16 months, 1-61) than in the WBRT group (13 months, 3-52), without statistical significance (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.69-3.64). Concerning neurocognition, patients in the SR group improved in the follow-up assessments, while this was not observed in the WBRT group. There were positive signals in terms of QOL within the SR group, but no significant differences in the global QLQ and QLQ-C30 summary scores were found. Our results indicate comparable efficacy of SR in terms of local control, with better maintenance of neurocognitive function. Unsurprisingly, more distant intracranial relapses occurred. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01667640.

摘要

为使脑转移瘤切除术后的复发风险降至最低,全脑放射治疗(WBRT)已成为辅助治疗的标准方案。随着癌症患者总生存期的延长,WBRT的有害影响日益受到关注。局部照射(SR)旨在通过对切除腔和肿瘤床进行照射,从而保护未受累的脑组织。40例单发脑转移瘤切除术后的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受WBRT(n = 18)或SR(n = 22)治疗。两组的局部肿瘤控制情况均令人满意。SR组(中位时间3个月,1 - 6个月)的复发时间早于WBRT组(中位时间8个月,7 - 9个月)(风险比[HR],0.63;95%置信区间[CI],0.03 - 10.62)。17例患者出现远处颅内复发。大多数复发(n = 15)发生在SR组,而WBRT组仅有2例患者出现新的远处肿瘤表现(HR,6.59;95% CI,1.71 - 11.49;p = 0.002)。中位总生存期(OS)为15.5个月(范围:1 - 61个月),SR组的OS(16个月,1 - 61个月)长于WBRT组(13个月,3 - 52个月),但无统计学意义(HR,0.55;95% CI,0.69 - 3.64)。在神经认知方面,SR组患者在随访评估中有所改善,而WBRT组未观察到这种情况。SR组在生活质量(QOL)方面有积极信号,但在全球QLQ和QLQ - C30总结评分中未发现显著差异。我们的结果表明,SR在局部控制方面具有相当的疗效,且能更好地维持神经认知功能。不出所料,远处颅内复发更多。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01667640

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44be/7732624/26d8e41bfeb6/fonc-10-591884-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验