Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy for intracranial metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis has a negative influence on the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. Conventionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was favored as the standard treatment for brain metastases. However, it has been linked to a significant decline in neuro-cognitive function and poor quality of life. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently gained prominence as an alternative modality, considering that it provides targeted high-dose radiation while minimizing adverse effects. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of SRS versus WBRT in patients with intracranial metastases.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, through July 2024, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles comparing WBRT and SRS in patients with intracranial metastases. Outcomes included local and distant recurrence, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and survival. We also used a random-effect model to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The findings revealed no significant differences in local (risk ratio [RR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.46, 1.06]) or distant recurrence rates (RR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.54, 1.28], = 0.41) between WBRT and SRS. However, SRS was associated with a greater risk of post-radiation LMD (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.09, 95% CI [1.47, 6.49], = 0.003). Survival rates at 1 year (RR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.83, 1.29], = 0.76) and 5 years (RR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.39, 2.04], = 0.78) demonstrated no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

SRS and WBRT exhibited similar recurrence rates and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 5 years, with WBRT being more effective in managing post-radiation LMD. SRS patients, on the other hand, had longer OS when measured in months.