• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释视觉搜索中干扰项统计信息的影响。

Explaining the effects of distractor statistics in visual search.

作者信息

Calder-Travis Joshua, Ma Wei Ji

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2020 Dec 2;20(13):11. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.13.11.

DOI:10.1167/jov.20.13.11
PMID:33331851
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7746958/
Abstract

Visual search, the task of detecting or locating target items among distractor items in a visual scene, is an important function for animals and humans. Different theoretical accounts make differing predictions for the effects of distractor statistics. Here we use a task in which we parametrically vary distractor items, allowing for a simultaneously fine-grained and comprehensive study of distractor statistics. We found effects of target-distractor similarity, distractor variability, and an interaction between the two, although the effect of the interaction on performance differed from the one expected. To explain these findings, we constructed computational process models that make trial-by-trial predictions for behavior based on the stimulus presented. These models, including a Bayesian observer model, provided excellent accounts of both the qualitative and quantitative effects of distractor statistics, as well as of the effect of changing the statistics of the environment (in the form of distractors being drawn from a different distribution). We conclude with a broader discussion of the role of computational process models in the understanding of visual search.

摘要

视觉搜索,即在视觉场景中的干扰项中检测或定位目标项的任务,对动物和人类而言都是一项重要功能。不同的理论解释对干扰项统计数据的影响做出了不同预测。在此,我们采用了一项任务,其中我们对干扰项进行参数化变化,从而能够对干扰项统计数据进行同时精细且全面的研究。我们发现了目标 - 干扰项相似度、干扰项变异性以及二者之间的相互作用所产生的影响,尽管这种相互作用对表现的影响与预期不同。为了解释这些发现,我们构建了计算过程模型,这些模型基于所呈现的刺激对行为进行逐次试验预测。这些模型,包括贝叶斯观察者模型,对干扰项统计数据的定性和定量影响以及改变环境统计数据(以从不同分布中抽取干扰项的形式)的影响都提供了出色的解释。我们最后对计算过程模型在理解视觉搜索中的作用进行了更广泛的讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/3f172c1fcc78/jovi-20-13-11-f020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/474e7b133547/jovi-20-13-11-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/50015fd86680/jovi-20-13-11-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/a8fb6d210150/jovi-20-13-11-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/a323b9c4e256/jovi-20-13-11-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/1f54c5e4fd3c/jovi-20-13-11-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/4a051b4774ad/jovi-20-13-11-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/1f36cbf5c649/jovi-20-13-11-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/7820bcb7a4ed/jovi-20-13-11-f008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/e14e3275ce06/jovi-20-13-11-f009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/e77a072fb883/jovi-20-13-11-f010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/735145dce942/jovi-20-13-11-f011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/1530a2ca66f2/jovi-20-13-11-f012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/dc56a3bd1143/jovi-20-13-11-f013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/6779eacd6520/jovi-20-13-11-f014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/d0edb429c224/jovi-20-13-11-f015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/2de17cf43f93/jovi-20-13-11-f016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/92dc89988591/jovi-20-13-11-f017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/71addc8917a9/jovi-20-13-11-f018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/a5601b2a5bf9/jovi-20-13-11-f019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/3f172c1fcc78/jovi-20-13-11-f020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/474e7b133547/jovi-20-13-11-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/50015fd86680/jovi-20-13-11-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/a8fb6d210150/jovi-20-13-11-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/a323b9c4e256/jovi-20-13-11-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/1f54c5e4fd3c/jovi-20-13-11-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/4a051b4774ad/jovi-20-13-11-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/1f36cbf5c649/jovi-20-13-11-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/7820bcb7a4ed/jovi-20-13-11-f008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/e14e3275ce06/jovi-20-13-11-f009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/e77a072fb883/jovi-20-13-11-f010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/735145dce942/jovi-20-13-11-f011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/1530a2ca66f2/jovi-20-13-11-f012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/dc56a3bd1143/jovi-20-13-11-f013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/6779eacd6520/jovi-20-13-11-f014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/d0edb429c224/jovi-20-13-11-f015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/2de17cf43f93/jovi-20-13-11-f016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/92dc89988591/jovi-20-13-11-f017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/71addc8917a9/jovi-20-13-11-f018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/a5601b2a5bf9/jovi-20-13-11-f019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b135/7746958/3f172c1fcc78/jovi-20-13-11-f020.jpg

相似文献

1
Explaining the effects of distractor statistics in visual search.解释视觉搜索中干扰项统计信息的影响。
J Vis. 2020 Dec 2;20(13):11. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.13.11.
2
Dwelling on distractors varying in target-distractor similarity.专注于目标与干扰项相似度不同的干扰项。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102859. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
3
A salient and task-irrelevant collinear structure hurts visual search.一个显著且与任务无关的共线结构会损害视觉搜索。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0124190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124190. eCollection 2015.
4
Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.任务集调制注意捕获的效应取决于视觉搜索中的干扰项代价:来自N2pc的证据。
Neuroreport. 2014 Jul 9;25(10):737-42. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000163.
5
Effects of part-based similarity on visual search: the Frankenbear experiment.基于部分的相似性对视觉搜索的影响:弗兰肯熊实验。
Vision Res. 2012 Feb 1;54:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
6
Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.通过目标选择和分心物过滤的统计学习来改变空间优先图。
Cortex. 2018 May;102:67-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
7
Parallel, exhaustive processing underlies logarithmic search functions: Visual search with cortical magnification.并行穷尽处理是对数搜索函数的基础:具有皮质放大的视觉搜索。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1343-1350. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1466-1.
8
Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.双额经颅直流电刺激对视觉注意中目标位置和分心物显著性相互作用的极性依赖性影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jun;30(6):851-866. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01242. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.经 TMS 探究分心物过滤的神经机制及其历史相关调制。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7591-7603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2740-18.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
10
Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.在多个目标类别中进行搜索揭示了视觉工作记忆的灵活性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Feb;183:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Processing of Noise-Vocoded Speech Under Divided Attention: An fMRI-Machine Learning Study.注意力分散情况下噪声-声码语音的神经处理:一项功能磁共振成像-机器学习研究
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 1;46(11):e70312. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70312.
2
Perceptual adaptation to dysarthric speech is modulated by concurrent phonological processing: A dual task study.对构音障碍语音的感知适应受并发语音处理的调节:一项双重任务研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 Mar 1;157(3):1598-1611. doi: 10.1121/10.0035883.
3
Perceptual Learning of Noise-Vocoded Speech Under Divided Attention.

本文引用的文献

1
Imperfect Bayesian inference in visual perception.视觉感知中的非完美贝叶斯推理。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Apr 18;15(4):e1006465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006465. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Variable precision in visual perception.视觉感知的可变精度。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Jan;126(1):89-132. doi: 10.1037/rev0000128. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Bayesian comparison of explicit and implicit causal inference strategies in multisensory heading perception.贝叶斯比较多感觉头部感知中显式和隐式因果推理策略。
分散注意条件下噪声语音的感知学习。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231192297. doi: 10.1177/23312165231192297.
4
How do (perceptual) distracters distract?(感知)分心物是如何让人分心的?
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 13;18(10):e1010609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010609. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Classic Visual Search Effects in an Additional Singleton Task: An Open Dataset.附加单一目标任务中的经典视觉搜索效应:一个开放数据集
J Cogn. 2021 Jul 28;4(1):34. doi: 10.5334/joc.182. eCollection 2021.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Jul 27;14(7):e1006110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006110. eCollection 2018 Jul.
4
Rapid learning of visual ensembles.视觉集合的快速学习。
J Vis. 2017 Feb 1;17(2):21. doi: 10.1167/17.2.21.
5
Computational Precision of Mental Inference as Critical Source of Human Choice Suboptimality.心理推理的计算精度是人类选择次优性的关键来源。
Neuron. 2016 Dec 21;92(6):1398-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
6
Do People Take Stimulus Correlations into Account in Visual Search?人们在视觉搜索中会考虑刺激相关性吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0149402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149402. eCollection 2016.
7
Requiem for the max rule?“最大规则”的挽歌?
Vision Res. 2015 Nov;116(Pt B):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.019. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
8
The Bouma law of crowding, revised: critical spacing is equal across parts, not objects.布马拥挤定律修订版:临界间距在各部分相等,而非在各物体间相等。
J Vis. 2014 Dec 10;14(6):10. doi: 10.1167/14.6.10.
9
Independence is elusive: set size effects on encoding precision in visual search.独立性难以捉摸:集合大小对视觉搜索中编码精度的影响。
J Vis. 2013 Apr 10;13(5):8. doi: 10.1167/13.5.8.
10
Does precision decrease with set size?精度会随着集合大小而降低吗?
J Vis. 2012 Jun 8;12(6):10. doi: 10.1167/12.6.10.