Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Jan;317:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
We aimed to explore the association between blood pressure, intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) risks and ICAS burden in the Chinese population.
A retrospective hospital-based multi-center case-control study with large sample size was conducted. 1055 ICAS patients and 1296 non-ICAS subjects with complete clinical information and intracranial artery evaluation were identified between 2014 and 2019. Cerebral arteries were evaluated by magnetic resonance angiography, and/or computed tomography, and/or digital subtraction angiography. Two or more neurologists were involved in reading and assessment of images. The association between ICAS and burden of ICAS with blood pressure was evaluated with univariate logistic models and multivariate logistic models.
With every increase of 10 mmHg in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure, the odds of ICAS increased by 32%, 28% and 35% in multivariate analysis, respectively (odds ratio = 1.32, 1.28, and 1.35 respectively, all p < 0.001). Similarly, every increment of 10 mmHg in systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure was associated with an increased risk of ICAS burden (each odds ratio = 1.08, p < 0.05).
Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure were associated with the risk of ICAS in a dose-response manner. Moreover, higher systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure could lead to higher ICAS burdens.
本研究旨在探讨中国人群血压、颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS)风险与 ICAS 负担之间的关联。
这是一项回顾性、基于医院的、多中心的大样本病例对照研究。2014 年至 2019 年期间,共纳入 1055 例 ICAS 患者和 1296 例非 ICAS 对照者,所有患者均具有完整的临床资料和颅内动脉评估。采用磁共振血管造影、计算机断层扫描、数字减影血管造影等方法评估脑动脉。由两名或以上神经科医生参与阅片和评估。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归模型评估 ICAS 与血压及 ICAS 负担之间的关联。
在校正其他混杂因素后,多因素逻辑回归分析显示,收缩压、舒张压和脉压每增加 10mmHg,ICAS 的发生风险分别增加 32%、28%和 35%(比值比分别为 1.32、1.28 和 1.35,均 P<0.001)。同样,收缩压和脉压每增加 10mmHg,ICAS 负担的发生风险也随之增加(比值比分别为 1.08,P<0.05)。
收缩压、舒张压和脉压与 ICAS 的发病风险呈剂量-反应关系。此外,较高的收缩压和脉压可能导致更高的 ICAS 负担。