Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, and Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (Kalb); Institute on Disability and National Center for START Services, University of New Hampshire, Durham (Beasley, Caoili); Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, New Hampshire (McLaren); Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Barnhill).
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Mar 1;72(3):273-280. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000301. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities disproportionately use emergency psychiatric services compared with their neurotypical peers, suggesting that such individuals and their supports are at increased risk for crisis events. This prospective study examined the timing, outcomes, and predictors of mental health crises for this population.
The data came from Systemic, Therapeutic, Assessment, Resources, and Treatment (START), a national model that provides mental health crisis services for those with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the United States. The study included 1,188 individuals from four U.S. regions enrolled between 2018 and 2019. The outcome was urgent crisis contacts with the START program. Baseline and clinical predictors were examined with multivariate regression analyses.
More than a quarter had at least one crisis contact, and 9% had three or more. Contacts increased within the initial 3 months of START enrollment, followed by a steep drop-off thereafter; few contacts happened after 1 year. Almost 45% of the contacts occurred after hours, and 30% involved police. Clinical factors predicted crisis contact most robustly, followed by lack of occupational supports. After START crisis intervention, 73% of individuals remained in their primary setting.
For individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and mental health needs, crisis stabilization resources are needed, including after hours. Results clearly identify times and risk factors for mental health crisis contacts, including frequent involvement with emergency responders. Importantly, gainful employment conveyed benefits for community stabilization. Findings may be leveraged to develop effective mental health crisis intervention services and supports for this underserved group.
与神经典型同龄人相比,智力和发育障碍个体过度使用急诊精神科服务,这表明此类个体及其支持人员发生危机事件的风险增加。本前瞻性研究检查了该人群心理健康危机的时间、结果和预测因素。
数据来自美国全国性的精神健康危机服务模型——系统、治疗、评估、资源和治疗(START)。该研究纳入了来自美国四个地区的 1188 名在 2018 年至 2019 年间入组的个体。结局是与 START 项目的紧急危机接触。使用多变量回归分析检查基线和临床预测因素。
超过四分之一的个体至少有一次危机接触,9%的个体有三次或更多次接触。接触在 START 登记的最初 3 个月内增加,此后急剧下降;1 年后很少有接触。近 45%的接触发生在非工作时间,30%涉及警察。临床因素对危机接触的预测最准确,其次是缺乏职业支持。在 START 危机干预后,73%的个体仍留在其主要环境中。
对于有智力和发育障碍及精神健康需求的个体,需要有危机稳定资源,包括非工作时间。结果清楚地确定了心理健康危机接触的时间和风险因素,包括与紧急救援人员的频繁接触。重要的是,有收益的就业为社区稳定带来了好处。这些发现可用于为这一服务不足的群体开发有效的精神健康危机干预服务和支持。