Adolescent Risk Research Unit (ARRU), Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience - Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), Australia; School of Social Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), Australia.
Adolescent Risk Research Unit (ARRU), Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience - Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), Australia; School of Social Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), Australia; Consortium of Adolescent Road Safety (cadrosa.org), Australia.
J Safety Res. 2020 Dec;75:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
Few studies have investigated what guidance occurs during the Learner phase of driving, particularly during formal lessons. The objective of this research was threefold: (a) investigate functional and higher-order driving instruction (HO-DI) in formal Learner lessons, (b) explore teaching approaches within the context of a theoretical framework, and (c) investigate variation in these three elements of instruction as a function of Learner driving experience. The theoretical framework developed to guide this research integrated the constructivist Goals for Driver Education and self-determination theory.
Professional instruction was explored through naturalistic observation; 15 instructors provided GoPro recordings of 110 driving lessons with Learners aged 16-19 years (n = 96) at varying levels of experience: Early (<20 logbook hours), Mid (21-70 h), and Late (71->100 h).
Employing a previously-developed coding taxonomy, instructor guidance opportunities were identified as 15% HO-DI, 73% functional instruction, and 12% untaken or missed HO-DI. Functional instruction peaked in the Mid Phase, while HO-DI was prominent in the Early phase suggesting missed opportunities in the later phases when use of silence peaked. Some elements of self-determination theory's needs-supportive model were readily identified in teaching approaches, such as feedback.
An understanding of functional and HO-DI, including teaching strategies, was established within the context of an integrated theoretical framework, with different trajectories across Learner experience identified. Teaching strategies reflected constructivism and self-determination theory providing theoretical support for these frameworks to be applied in future driver training studies. Continued research efforts are needed to understand how best to balance functional and HO-DI to maximize young novice drivers' learning prior to independent driving, particularly during the late Learner period. Practical Applications: Naturalistic observation of current HO-DI and teaching approaches supports the feasibility of integrating recommended improvements arising from the theoretical framework within current practice, with practical implications for improvements to industry training.
很少有研究调查驾驶学习阶段(尤其是在正式课程中)会提供哪些指导。本研究的目的有三个:(a)调查正式学习课程中的功能和高级驾驶指导(HO-DI);(b)在理论框架内探索教学方法;(c)调查这些教学要素随学习者驾驶经验的变化。指导本研究的理论框架整合了驾驶员教育的建构主义目标和自主决定理论。
通过自然观察探索专业指导;15 名教练员为年龄在 16-19 岁的学习者(n=96)提供了 110 次驾驶课程的 GoPro 记录,他们的驾驶经验程度不同:早期(<20 小时驾驶日志)、中期(21-70 小时)和晚期(71-100 小时)。
采用先前开发的编码分类法,确定了 15%的 HO-DI、73%的功能指导和 12%的未实施或错过的 HO-DI指导机会。功能指导在中期阶段达到顶峰,而 HO-DI 在早期阶段更为突出,表明在后期阶段,当沉默达到顶峰时,错过了机会。在教学方法中,很容易识别出自决定理论需求支持模型的一些要素,例如反馈。
在综合理论框架的背景下,建立了对功能和 HO-DI 的理解,包括教学策略,并确定了学习者经验的不同轨迹。教学策略反映了建构主义和自主决定理论,为这些框架在未来驾驶员培训研究中的应用提供了理论支持。需要进一步研究如何在独立驾驶前,特别是在后期学习阶段,最好地平衡功能和 HO-DI,以最大限度地提高年轻新手驾驶员的学习效果。
当前 HO-DI 和教学方法的自然观察支持在当前实践中整合理论框架中提出的改进建议的可行性,对行业培训的改进具有实际意义。