The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China; Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China.
Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China.
Surgery. 2021 May;169(5):1116-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
Thus far, the association of tumor size with prognosis in colon cancer has not been considered and has remained unclear. This study, therefore, aimed to investigate the association between tumor size as a continuous variable and prognosis in colon cancer using Cox models with restricted cubic splines.
Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we selected 128,369 patients with colon cancer who underwent surgery. Overall survival and colon cancer-specific survival were separately analyzed, and tumor size was separately evaluated as a continuous variable and a categorical variable. To investigate the relationship after adjusting for covariates, we used the proportional hazards models. The restricted cubic splines model was used to determine the presence of nonlinear or linear association and flexibly visualize the association.
The adjusted covariate model showed that the hazard ratio of colon cancer rapidly increased with a tumor size of 4 cm and slowly increased with a tumor size larger than 4 cm. When tumor size was analyzed as a categorical variable, the multivariable-adjusted model demonstrated a nearly linear relationship between tumor size and hazard ratio regardless of overall survival or cancer-specific survival, and the hazard ratio of group 5 (4.1-5 cm) was nearly a turning point. Subgroup analysis with respect to lymph node metastasis showed that the relationship between tumor size and prognosis in colon cancer was evident in lymph node metastasis.
There was a strong negative relationship between tumor size and prognosis in colon cancer. However, when tumor size was less than 4 cm, the relationship between tumor size and prognosis was steep compared with that when tumor size was larger than 4 cm, especially in lymph node metastasis.
到目前为止,肿瘤大小与结肠癌预后的关系尚未得到考虑,也不清楚。因此,本研究旨在使用 Cox 模型限制立方样条来探讨肿瘤大小作为连续变量与结肠癌预后的关系。
使用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库,我们选择了 128369 例接受手术治疗的结肠癌患者。分别分析总生存率和结肠癌特异性生存率,肿瘤大小分别作为连续变量和分类变量进行评估。为了在调整协变量后研究这种关系,我们使用了比例风险模型。限制立方样条模型用于确定是否存在非线性或线性关联,并灵活地可视化关联。
调整后的协变量模型显示,结肠癌的危险比随着肿瘤大小的增加而迅速增加,当肿瘤大小大于 4cm 时缓慢增加。当肿瘤大小作为分类变量进行分析时,多变量调整模型显示肿瘤大小与危险比之间存在近乎线性的关系,无论整体生存率还是癌症特异性生存率如何,第 5 组(4.1-5cm)的危险比几乎是一个转折点。淋巴结转移的亚组分析表明,肿瘤大小与结肠癌预后之间的关系在淋巴结转移中很明显。
肿瘤大小与结肠癌的预后之间存在强烈的负相关关系。然而,当肿瘤大小小于 4cm 时,肿瘤大小与预后之间的关系比肿瘤大小大于 4cm 时陡峭,特别是在淋巴结转移的情况下。