Survey of clinically used adhesive ceramic bonding methods - follow up after 12 years.

OBJECTIVES

This survey evaluated dentists' use of adhesive bonding methods of all-ceramic restorations over a period of twelve years. This is a follow-up survey which had been undertaken in 2007, 2011, and in 2015 [1].

METHODS

A multiple choice questionnaire regarding adhesive bonding methods for all-ceramic restoration was developed and handed out in 2007 and 2019 to dentist participating in a local annual dental meeting in Northern Germany. The questionnaires were evaluated on the basis of evidence-based techniques from the scientific literature.

RESULTS

Data from 93 questionnaires (2019) were compared with 90 evaluated questionnaires from 2007. Bonding of oxide ceramic had improved over the years of observation (7% to 62%) whereas evidence-based bonding of silicate ceramic restorations decreased from 66% to 38%; common mistakes were using air abrasion on silicate surface. Females showed better values for correct adhesive cementation than males (f: 39-50%, m: 22%-41%). A correlation between correct cementation and years of professional experience could not be revealed.

CONCLUSION

Incorrect bonding of oxide ceramic restorations decreased within the 12 years investigated whereas there was no improvement of evidence-based bonding procedures of silicate ceramics. Still a high number of survey participants need additional training in bonding techniques.