Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Qatar.
Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Qatar; Sports Orthopaedic Research Center-Copenhagen (SORC-C), Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
J Sci Med Sport. 2021 May;24(5):454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
To investigate the association between clinical assessment and MRI measures of oedema and MRI grading in male athletes with acute adductor injuries.
Cross-sectional study.
We included 81 consecutive athletes with acute adductor injuries. All athletes received a standardized clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), blinded to clinical information. We analysed correlations between extent of palpation pain and extent of MRI oedema for the adductor longus. We compared the clinical assessment to MRI adductor injury grading (0-3) using ordinal regression. We analysed positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) of a complete adductor longus avulsion.
Proximal-distal length of adductor longus palpation pain had fair correlation with MRI proximal-distal oedema length oedema (r=0.309, p=0.022). Cross-sectional surface area of palpation pain had poor correlation with corresponding cross-sectional MRI oedema area (r=0.173, p=0.208). The symptoms subscale of the Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) for the period since injury (log odds ratio=0.97, p=0.021) and passive adductor stretch pain (log odds ratio=0.35, p=0.046) were associated with MRI injury grading. If there was a palpable defect, MRI always showed a complete avulsion (PPV=100%). Several tests had high negative predictive values: passive adductor stretch (100%), palpation pain at the adductor longus insertion (98%), and the FABER test (98%).
The extent of palpation pain does not indicate the extent of MRI oedema in acute adductor longus injuries. A worse modified HAGOS symptoms subscale score and passive adductor stretch pain indicate a higher MRI adductor injury grade. Clinical examination tests have high ability to detect or rule out a complete adductor longus avulsion on MRI.
研究男性运动员急性内收肌损伤的临床评估与水肿的 MRI 测量值和 MRI 分级之间的关系。
横断面研究。
我们纳入了 81 例连续的急性内收肌损伤运动员。所有运动员均接受了标准化的临床评估和磁共振成像(MRI)检查,检查时不了解临床信息。我们分析了内收长肌触诊疼痛范围与 MRI 水肿范围之间的相关性。我们使用有序回归比较了临床评估与 MRI 内收肌损伤分级(0-3 级)。我们分析了完全性内收长肌撕裂的阳性和阴性预测值(PPV/NPV)。
内收长肌近-远侧触诊疼痛的长度与 MRI 近-远侧水肿长度具有中等相关性(r=0.309,p=0.022)。触诊疼痛的横截面积与相应的 MRI 水肿面积相关性较差(r=0.173,p=0.208)。损伤后(log 优势比=0.97,p=0.021)和被动内收伸展疼痛(log 优势比=0.35,p=0.046)的科堡髋关节和腹股沟结局评分(HAGOS)症状亚量表与 MRI 损伤分级相关。如果有可触及的缺陷,MRI 总是显示完全性撕脱(PPV=100%)。几个检查具有较高的阴性预测值:被动内收伸展(100%)、内收长肌止点触诊疼痛(98%)和 FABER 试验(98%)。
触诊疼痛的范围并不能反映急性内收长肌损伤的 MRI 水肿范围。改良的 HAGOS 症状亚量表评分更差和被动内收伸展疼痛提示 MRI 内收肌损伤程度更高。临床检查试验具有较高的能力在 MRI 上发现或排除完全性内收长肌撕裂。