Kozlowska O, Attwood S, Lumb A, Tan G D, Rea R
Oxford Brookes University, Headington Campus, Oxford, UK.
Bicester Health Centre (retired), UK.
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Nov 2;20(4):21. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5177.
Disparities in diabetes care are prevalent, with significant inequalities observed in access to, and outcomes of, healthcare. A population health approach offers a solution to improve the quality of care for all with systematic ways of assessing whole population requirements and treating and monitoring sub-groups in need of additional attention.
Collaborative working between primary, secondary and community care was introduced in seven primary care practices in one locality in England, UK, caring for 3560 patients with diabetes and sharing the same community and secondary specialist diabetes care providers. Three elements of the intervention included 1) clinical audit, 2) risk stratification, and 3) the multi-disciplinary virtual clinics in the community.
This paper evaluates the acceptability, feasibility and short-term impact on primary care of implementing a population approach intervention using direct observations of the clinics and surveys of participating clinicians.
Eighteen virtual clinics across seven teams took place over six months between March and July 2017 with organisation, resources, policies, education and approximately 150 individuals discussed. The feedback from primary care was positive with growing knowledge and confidence managing people with complex diabetes in primary care.
Taking a population health approach helped to identify groups of people in need of additional diabetes care and deliver a collaborative health intervention across traditional organisational boundaries.
糖尿病护理方面的差异普遍存在,在医疗保健的可及性和治疗结果方面存在显著不平等。人群健康方法提供了一种解决方案,通过系统评估整个人群的需求以及治疗和监测需要额外关注的亚组,来提高所有人的护理质量。
在英国英格兰一个地区的7家初级保健机构引入了初级、二级和社区护理之间的协作工作,这些机构负责照顾3560名糖尿病患者,并共享相同的社区和二级专科糖尿病护理提供者。干预措施的三个要素包括:1)临床审核,2)风险分层,3)社区中的多学科虚拟诊所。
本文通过对诊所的直接观察和对参与临床医生的调查,评估采用人群方法干预对初级保健的可接受性、可行性和短期影响。
2017年3月至7月的六个月期间,七个团队共开展了18次虚拟诊所,涉及组织、资源、政策、教育等方面,并与约150人进行了讨论。初级保健机构的反馈是积极的,在初级保健中管理复杂糖尿病患者的知识和信心有所增强。
采用人群健康方法有助于识别需要额外糖尿病护理的人群,并跨越传统组织界限开展协作性健康干预。