Wieczorek Marcus, Sassani Kiarash, Hoeltgen Reinhard
School of Medicine Witten/Herdecke University Witten Germany.
Department of Cardiology and Electrophysiology St. Agnes-Hospital Bocholt Bocholt Germany.
J Arrhythm. 2020 Sep 24;36(6):1051-1060. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12436. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is safe and effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We compare and correlate pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns at repeat ablation in patients with recurrent AF after PVI using duty-cycled radiofrequency (RF) technology (PVAC) or second-generation cryoballoon (CB) with the time of AF recurrence.
In total, 85 PVAC and 66 CB patients undergoing a second ablation were enrolled 9.7 ± 3.4 months after initial PVI. PV reconnections were comparably high between both groups (93% PVAC and 92% CB patients). A mean of 2.79 ± 1.2 PVs/patient were reconnected after PVAC PVI compared with 1.97 ± 0.8 in CB patients, < .0001. 33% PVAC patients, but no CB patient had 4 reconnected PVs ( < .0001). Early AF recurrences were more frequently observed in PVAC patients with ≥2 reconnected PVs, in CB patients with ≥3 reconnected PVs (both < .01) and patients without PV reconnection, irrespective of the ablation technique. One reconnected PV was associated with late AF recurrence only in CB patients. The correlation between number of reconnected PVs and time of AF recurrence was -0.32 for PVAC and -0.52 for CB.
CB PVI was associated with greater durability and lesser PV reconnections/patient. There were negative correlations for both devices between extent of PV reconnections and time of AF recurrence. CB patients with early AF recurrences- although less frequently observed compared with PVAC patients had more reconnected PVs than PVAC patients, suggesting additional effects for AF prevention after CB PVI.
肺静脉隔离(PVI)治疗心房颤动(AF)安全有效。我们比较并关联了使用占空比射频(RF)技术(PVAC)或第二代冷冻球囊(CB)对PVI术后复发AF患者进行再次消融时的肺静脉(PV)重新连接模式与AF复发时间。
共有85例接受PVAC治疗和66例接受CB治疗的患者在首次PVI术后9.7±3.4个月接受了第二次消融。两组的PV重新连接率相当高(PVAC组为93%,CB组为92%)。PVAC组PVI术后平均每位患者有2.79±1.2条PV重新连接,而CB组为1.97±0.8条,P<0.0001。33%的PVAC组患者有4条PV重新连接,但CB组无患者出现这种情况(P<0.0001)。在PV重新连接≥2条的PVAC组患者、PV重新连接≥3条的CB组患者(均P<0.01)以及未出现PV重新连接的患者中,无论采用何种消融技术,早期AF复发更为常见。仅在CB组患者中,1条PV重新连接与晚期AF复发相关。PV重新连接数量与AF复发时间之间的相关性,PVAC组为-0.32,CB组为-0.52。
CB PVI具有更高的持久性,且每位患者的PV重新连接较少。两种设备的PV重新连接程度与AF复发时间之间均呈负相关。早期AF复发的CB组患者——尽管与PVAC组患者相比观察到的频率较低,但重新连接的PV比PVAC组患者更多,提示CB PVI术后对预防AF有额外作用。