• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针刺干预慢性阻塞性肺疾病的报告完整性:对 STRICTA 声明依从性的评估。

Completeness of reporting acupuncture interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Review of adherence to the STRICTA statement.

机构信息

School of Health Science Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.

Global Research on Wellbeing (GRoW) Research Group, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2020 Apr 2;9:226. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22843.3. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.22843.3
PMID:33335712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7713895/
Abstract

The completeness of reporting  of acupuncture interventions is critical to ensure the applicability and reproducibility of acupuncture clinical trials. In the past, different publications have evaluated the completeness of reporting of acupuncture interventions for different clinical situations, such as knee osteoarthritis, neurological diseases or cancer. However, this has not been done for acupuncture trials for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To assess the completeness of reporting of acupuncture interventions in trials for COPD. A total of 11 English and Chinese databases were screened up until May 2019 for randomised or quasi-randomised control trials of acupuncture for COPD. The STRICTA checklist was used to determine the quality of the reporting of acupuncture interventions. A total of 28 trials were included in our review. Out of the 16 STRICTA checklist subitems analysed, only 4 were considered appropriately reported in more than 70% of the trials, while 7 were correctly reported in less than 30%. The adherence to STRICTA guidelines of acupuncture trials for COPD is suboptimal, and future efforts need to be addressed to improve the completeness of reporting.

摘要

针刺干预措施报告的完整性对于确保针刺临床试验的适用性和可重复性至关重要。过去,不同的出版物已经评估了针对不同临床情况(如膝骨关节炎、神经疾病或癌症)的针刺干预措施报告的完整性。然而,对于 COPD 的针刺试验尚未进行过此类评估。评估 COPD 针刺试验中针刺干预措施报告的完整性。从 2019 年 5 月之前,我们总共筛选了 11 个英文和中文数据库,以查找针对 COPD 的针刺随机或半随机对照试验。我们使用 STRICTA 清单来确定针刺干预措施报告的质量。共有 28 项试验纳入了我们的综述。在分析的 16 项 STRICTA 清单子项中,只有 4 项在超过 70%的试验中被认为报告得当,而 7 项在不到 30%的试验中报告得当。COPD 针刺试验对 STRICTA 指南的遵循情况并不理想,未来需要努力提高报告的完整性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/7714274/bb0902ccfeeb/f1000research-9-30829-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/7714274/f1307986a5ae/f1000research-9-30829-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/7714274/bb0902ccfeeb/f1000research-9-30829-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/7714274/f1307986a5ae/f1000research-9-30829-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/7714274/bb0902ccfeeb/f1000research-9-30829-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Completeness of reporting acupuncture interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Review of adherence to the STRICTA statement.针刺干预慢性阻塞性肺疾病的报告完整性:对 STRICTA 声明依从性的评估。
F1000Res. 2020 Apr 2;9:226. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22843.3. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines.使用CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估韩国文献中针灸随机对照试验的报告质量。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 29;4(7):e005068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005068.
3
Assessment of reporting completeness in acupuncture studies on patients with functional constipation using the STRICTA guidelines.采用 STRICTA 指南评估功能性便秘患者接受针刺治疗的研究报告完整性。
Complement Ther Med. 2022 Nov;70:102849. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102849. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
4
Assessment of Completeness of Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病针灸治疗随机对照试验报告完整性的评估
Int J Gen Med. 2022 May 31;15:5335-5348. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S356666. eCollection 2022.
5
[Evaluation of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for depression based on CONSORT statement, STRICTA criteria and SHARE checklist].基于CONSORT声明、STRICTA标准和SHARE清单对针刺治疗抑郁症随机对照试验报告质量的评价
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2024 Aug 12;44(8):966-74. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240110-k0003.
6
STRICTA: is it time to do more?严格标准:是时候做得更多了吗?
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Jun 20;15:190. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0714-4.
7
Do the CONSORT and STRICTA Checklists Improve the Reporting Quality of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese Journals? A Systematic Review and Analysis of Trends.CONSORT和STRICTA清单能否提高中文期刊发表的针灸随机对照试验的报告质量?一项系统评价及趋势分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147244. eCollection 2016.
8
The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional survey.针刺治疗膝骨关节炎的随机对照试验报告质量:横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195652. eCollection 2018.
9
[Evaluation of the report quality of Chinese and English randomized controlled trials of acupuncture based on CONSORT statement and STRICTA checklist].[基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单对针刺中英文随机对照试验报告质量的评价]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2023 Mar 12;43(3):355-61. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20220328-k0005.
10
[Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement (Chinese version)].[针灸临床试验报告干预措施的修订标准(STRICTA):扩展CONSORT声明(中文版)]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2010 Sep;8(9):804-18. doi: 10.3736/jcim20100902.

引用本文的文献

1
Descriptions of sham acupuncture in randomised controlled trials: a critical review of the literature.随机对照试验中 Sham acupuncture 的描述:文献的批判性回顾。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023 May 30;23(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04007-7.
2
Assessment of Completeness of Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病针灸治疗随机对照试验报告完整性的评估
Int J Gen Med. 2022 May 31;15:5335-5348. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S356666. eCollection 2022.