• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ⅰ期胃癌的预后因素:一项回顾性分析。

Prognostic factors in stage I gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Zheng Dingcheng, Chen Bangsheng, Shen Zefeng, Gu Lihu, Wang Xianfa, Ma Xueqiang, Chen Ping, Mao Feiyan, Wang Zhiyan

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive System Tumors of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Open Med (Wars). 2020 Aug 3;15(1):754-762. doi: 10.1515/med-2020-0164. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1515/med-2020-0164
PMID:33336033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7712043/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this research is to investigate the prognostic factors of patients with stage I gastric cancer (GC) and to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis for high-risk patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences from January 2001 to December 2015. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier were used to evaluate the relationship between the patients' clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 1,550 patients were eligible for the study. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of all enrolled patients was 96.5%. The pT and pN stages were significantly associated with the prognosis. The 5-year DFS rates of the three subgroups (T1N0, T2N0, and T1N1) were 97.8%, 95.7%, and 90.5%, respectively ( < 0.001). In the T1N1 subgroup, patients not undergoing chemotherapy showed a lower 5-year DFS rate compared to those undergoing chemotherapy, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the pT and pN stages were closely associated with the prognosis of patients with stage I GC. We also found that the danger coefficient of the pN stage was higher than that of the pT stage, and that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy might be a reasonable approach to improve outcomes of high-risk patients, particularly in the T1N1 group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨Ⅰ期胃癌(GC)患者的预后因素,并确定辅助化疗是否能改善高危患者的预后。

方法

我们于2001年1月至2015年12月在浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院和中国科学院大学附属华美医院进行了一项回顾性分析。采用Cox回归和Kaplan-Meier法评估患者临床病理特征与预后之间的关系。

结果

共有1550例患者符合研究条件。所有入组患者的5年无病生存率(DFS)为96.5%。pT和pN分期与预后显著相关。三个亚组(T1N0、T2N0和T1N1)的5年DFS率分别为97.8%、95.7%和90.5%(<0.001)。在T1N1亚组中,未接受化疗的患者5年DFS率低于接受化疗的患者,尽管差异无统计学意义。

结论

pT和pN分期均与Ⅰ期GC患者的预后密切相关。我们还发现pN分期的危险系数高于pT分期,术后辅助化疗可能是改善高危患者预后的合理方法,尤其是在T1N1组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c57/7712043/6e747e974ea2/j_med-2020-0164-fig003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c57/7712043/3e60edeaca54/j_med-2020-0164-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c57/7712043/e76e0adbf12c/j_med-2020-0164-fig002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c57/7712043/6e747e974ea2/j_med-2020-0164-fig003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c57/7712043/3e60edeaca54/j_med-2020-0164-fig001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c57/7712043/e76e0adbf12c/j_med-2020-0164-fig002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c57/7712043/6e747e974ea2/j_med-2020-0164-fig003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors in stage I gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis.Ⅰ期胃癌的预后因素:一项回顾性分析。
Open Med (Wars). 2020 Aug 3;15(1):754-762. doi: 10.1515/med-2020-0164. eCollection 2020.
2
Survival among subgroups of patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Ⅱ期鼻咽癌患者亚组的生存情况。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 29;12(1):7007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11145-4.
3
Poor prognostic factors in patients with stage I gastric cancer according to the seventh edition TNM classification: a comparative analysis of three subgroups.根据第七版 TNM 分类,Ⅰ期胃癌患者的不良预后因素:三个亚组的对比分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;105(3):323-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.22082. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
4
[Value of preoperative abdominal contrast-enhanced multiple-row detector computed tomography in predicting the postoperative 1-year disease-free survival for gastric cancer].术前腹部多排探测器增强CT在预测胃癌术后1年无病生存率中的价值
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 25;21(9):1059-1064.
5
Prognostic impact of extranodal extension in stage 1B gastric carcinomas.1B期胃癌结外侵犯的预后影响
Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 8.
6
[Prognostic value of the tumor deposit in N0 gastric cancer by propensity score matching analysis].[倾向评分匹配分析评估N0期胃癌中肿瘤结节的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):172-179.
7
[Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery versus direct surgery in the treatment of Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: long-term prognostic analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial].新辅助放化疗联合手术与直接手术治疗食管胃交界部SiewertⅡ型和Ⅲ型腺癌:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的长期预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;24(2):128-137. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20201019-00565.
8
[Survival benefit of an herbal formula for invigorating spleen for elderly patients with gastric cancer].[一种健脾中药配方对老年胃癌患者的生存获益]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2010 Mar;8(3):224-30. doi: 10.3736/jcim20100305.
9
[Safety and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and S-1 for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after D2 lymph nodes dissection].奥沙利铂联合S-1辅助化疗用于D2淋巴结清扫术后局部进展期胃癌患者的安全性和疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;24(2):145-152. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20201016-00561.
10
Prognostic analysis of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: pancreaticoduodenectomy versus local resection.壶腹癌的预后分析:胰十二指肠切除术与局部切除术对比
Hippokratia. 2012 Jan;16(1):23-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Clinicopathological Features on Gastric Cancer Stage According to TNM Classification.根据TNM分类法,临床病理特征对胃癌分期的影响
In Vivo. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):1112-1121. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13916.
2
Prognostic factors and adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in stage I gastric cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.Ⅰ期胃癌患者的预后因素及辅助化疗疗效:一项回顾性分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 24;24(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03573-5.
3
Identification and validation of the role of ZNF281 in 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy of gastric cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术与手术治疗早期胃癌的长期疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1493-1501. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04227-8. Epub 2019 May 6.
2
Implication of lymph node staging in migration and different treatment strategies for stage T2N0M0 and T1N1M0 resected gastric cancer: a SEER population analysis.淋巴结分期对 T2N0M0 和 T1N1M0 切除胃癌转移和不同治疗策略的影响:SEER 人群分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Nov;21(11):1499-1509. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02078-y. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
鉴定和验证 ZNF281 在胃癌 5-氟尿嘧啶化疗中的作用。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 16;150(6):307. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05838-8.
4
A Cost-Effective Model for Predicting Recurrent Gastric Cancer Using Clinical Features.一种利用临床特征预测复发性胃癌的经济有效模型。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;14(8):842. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14080842.
5
Association between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in stage I gastric cancer patients after curative resection.I期胃癌患者根治性切除术后辅助化疗与生存的相关性。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Dec 5;11:goad070. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad070. eCollection 2023.
6
Risk stratification for predicting postoperative recurrence of gastric cancer by grade of venous invasion.通过静脉侵犯程度对胃癌术后复发进行风险分层。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 May 30;23(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02825-0.
7
Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis.肿瘤大小是 T1 期胃癌的重要预后因素:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02737-z.
8
Clinical significance of the largest histopathological metastatic lymph node size for postoperative course of patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer.最大组织病理学转移淋巴结大小对胃癌手术患者术后病程的临床意义。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 17;10:1105189. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1105189. eCollection 2023.
Prognostic impact of extranodal extension in stage 1B gastric carcinomas.
1B期胃癌结外侵犯的预后影响
Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 8.
4
Helicobacter pylori Therapy for the Prevention of Metachronous Gastric Cancer.幽门螺杆菌治疗预防胃肿瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 22;378(12):1085-1095. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708423.
5
Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage system for gastric cancer patients: a population-based analysis.基于人群的分析验证美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第 8 版胃癌分期系统。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 May;21(3):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0770-1. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Adjuvant Chemotherapy vs Postoperative Observation Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Resection in Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.术前放化疗联合切除术与术后观察在胃食管交界癌中的辅助化疗:倾向评分匹配分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):31-38. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2805.
7
A Scoring System to Stratify Curability after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: "eCura system".一种用于早期胃癌内镜下黏膜下剥离术后可治愈性分层的评分系统:“eCura系统”。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;112(6):874-881. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.95. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
8
Prognostic Role of Primary Tumor Location in Non-Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 50 Studies.原发肿瘤位置对非转移性胃癌预后的作用:50 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2655-2668. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5832-4. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.未分化早期胃癌淋巴结转移的预测因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Apr;21(4):700-711. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3364-7. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
10
Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.胃癌临床实践指南(NCCN 肿瘤学版) 2016 年第 3 版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Oct;14(10):1286-1312. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0137.