Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Schothorst Feed Research BV, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Jun;101(8):3117-3122. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11020. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
The positive effects of phytases on the environment, animal welfare and animal feed costs have resulted in the continuous development and improvement of these enzymes in the non-ruminant feed market. To test the efficacy of these phytases, a large number of experimental animals are necessary, antagonising the animal welfare aspect of these enzymes. In the present review, we summarise the most prominent available in vitro assays for evaluating phytase enzymes and how far they can reduce the number of in vivo experiments. Several in vitro assays exist that differ in their setup, extent and conditions depending on the animal of interest and the research question. With the in vitro assays described, it is not possible to fully replace in vivo trials. However, for the investigation of phytase effects in feedstuffs, the use of an in vitro assay has several advantages. In vitro assays have the potential to be used for ranking feed enzymes and as screening tools. Applying in vitro protocols will result in a reduction in the number of animals or treatments usually necessary for an in vivo trial, thus acting towards the three Rs. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.
植酸酶对环境、动物福利和动物饲料成本的积极影响促使其在反刍动物饲料市场中的不断发展和改进。为了测试这些植酸酶的功效,需要大量的实验动物,这与这些酶的动物福利方面相矛盾。在本次综述中,我们总结了评估植酸酶的最突出的现有体外检测方法,以及它们在多大程度上可以减少体内实验的数量。现有的几种体外检测方法在设置、程度和条件上因研究的动物和研究问题的不同而不同。虽然有了这些体外检测方法,仍然不可能完全替代体内试验。然而,对于饲料中植酸酶作用的研究,使用体外检测方法有几个优点。体外检测方法具有作为饲料酶分级和筛选工具的潜力。应用体外方案将减少体内试验通常所需的动物数量或处理数量,从而有助于实现“三 R”原则。 © 2020 英国化学学会。