• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内罗毕亲密伴侣暴力幸存者中的生殖强迫。

Reproductive Coercion among Intimate Partner Violence Survivors in Nairobi.

机构信息

Shannon N. Wood, Linnea A. Zimmerman, Zaynab Hameeduddin, Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. Contact Author.

S. Rachel Kennedy, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Stud Fam Plann. 2020 Dec;51(4):343-360. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12141.

DOI:10.1111/sifp.12141
PMID:33336831
Abstract

Reproductive coercion (RC), or partner interference in reproductive decisions, limits women's autonomy. Little is known about RC behaviors and measurement in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this mixed-methods study, we examined the transferability of the US-developed RC Scale to the Kenyan context. Through community-based sampling, recent intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors were recruited from Nairobi's informal settlements. We conducted quantitative analyses (n = 327) to assess the transferability of RC measures via exploratory factor analysis and used descriptive statistics to examine prevalence and continuous metrics. We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs; n = 30) to contextualize results. Psychometric analyses indicated a two-factor solution comprising pregnancy coercion and condom manipulation (alpha = 0.86). Eighty-two percent of IPV survivors reported experiencing RC (pregnancy coercion = 76.6 percent; condom manipulation = 59.5 percent). IDIs highlighted women's multiple, severe RC experiences; experiences described in IDIs were largely consistent with quantitative findings. We found the RC Scale was transferable to this LMIC context, where IPV survivors face prevalent, severe RC and would benefit from linkage to woman-centered support services.

摘要

生殖胁迫(RC),即伴侣对生殖决策的干预,限制了妇女的自主权。在中低收入国家(LMICs),RC 行为及其衡量方法鲜为人知。在这项混合方法研究中,我们检验了美国开发的 RC 量表在肯尼亚背景下的可转移性。通过基于社区的抽样,从内罗毕的非正规住区招募了最近遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的幸存者。我们进行了定量分析(n = 327),通过探索性因素分析评估 RC 措施的可转移性,并使用描述性统计来检查流行率和连续指标。我们进行了深入访谈(IDIs;n = 30)来使结果背景化。心理测量分析表明,该量表存在包含怀孕胁迫和避孕套操纵的两因素解决方案(alpha = 0.86)。82%的 IPV 幸存者报告经历过 RC(怀孕胁迫 = 76.6%;避孕套操纵 = 59.5%)。IDIs 强调了妇女遭受的多种严重 RC 经历;IDIs 中描述的经历与定量发现基本一致。我们发现,RC 量表可以转移到这种 LMIC 背景下,在这种背景下,IPV 幸存者面临普遍存在的严重 RC,并且需要与以妇女为中心的支持服务联系起来。

相似文献

1
Reproductive Coercion among Intimate Partner Violence Survivors in Nairobi.内罗毕亲密伴侣暴力幸存者中的生殖强迫。
Stud Fam Plann. 2020 Dec;51(4):343-360. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12141.
2
Understanding the Link Between Reproductive Coercion and Covert Use of Contraception as a Safety Strategy for Women Experiencing Violence in Nairobi's Urban Informal Settlements.理解生殖胁迫与秘密使用避孕措施之间的联系,这是内罗毕城市非正规住区遭受暴力的妇女采取的一种安全策略。
Violence Against Women. 2023 May;29(6-7):1343-1367. doi: 10.1177/10778012221108422. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3
Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study.肯尼亚内罗毕计划生育诊所中女性和女孩的生殖强迫经历和干预机会:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7.
4
Protocol for a matched-pair cluster control trial of ARCHES (Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings) among women and girls seeking contraceptive services from community-based clinics in Nairobi, Kenya.ARCHES(在肯尼亚内罗毕的社区诊所寻求避孕服务的妇女和女孩中解决生殖胁迫问题)配对病例对照试验方案。
Reprod Health. 2020 May 27;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00916-9.
5
Evaluating a scalable ARCHES (Addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings) model in government health facilities in Uasin Gishu county, Kenya: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.评估肯尼亚乌干达县政府卫生设施中可扩展的 ARCHES(在卫生环境中解决生殖强迫)模型:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2023 Oct 17;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01697-7.
6
Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya.以诊所为基础的生殖权利赋权干预对避孕使用的近期结局、自我效能、态度以及对幸存者服务的认识和使用的影响:肯尼亚内罗毕的一项群组对照试验。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2227371. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2227371.
7
Intersection of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence: cross-sectional influences on women's contraceptive use in Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya.生育胁迫与亲密伴侣暴力的交叉:布基纳法索、科特迪瓦和肯尼亚对女性避孕使用的横断面影响。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e065697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065697.
8
Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion across ten sites: commonalities and divergence.生殖胁迫在十个地点的流行情况及其关联因素:共性与差异。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01568-1.
9
Men's reproductive coercion of women: prevalence, experiences, and coping strategies-a mixed method study in urban health facilities in León, Nicaragua.男性对女性的生殖胁迫:在尼加拉瓜莱昂市的城市卫生机构中进行的一项混合方法研究,其流行率、经历和应对策略。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 23;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01441-y.
10
Associations of intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion with contraceptive use in Uttar Pradesh, India: How associations differ across contraceptive methods.印度北方邦亲密伴侣暴力和生殖控制与避孕使用的关联:不同避孕方法关联的差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 16;15(10):e0241008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241008. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's reproductive mental health: currently available evidence and future directions for research, clinical practice and health policy.女性生殖心理健康:当前可得证据以及研究、临床实践和卫生政策的未来方向
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):196-215. doi: 10.1002/wps.21305.
2
Longitudinal impact of past-year reproductive coercion on contraceptive use dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from eight population-based cohorts.过去一年生殖胁迫对撒哈拉以南非洲地区避孕使用动态的纵向影响:来自八个基于人群的队列研究的证据
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 10;80:103056. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103056. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Factors Influencing Modern Family Planning Utilization and Barriers in Women of Reproductive Age in the Iringa Region, Tanzania: A Mixed-Methods Study.
坦桑尼亚伊林加地区影响育龄妇女现代计划生育利用情况及障碍的因素:一项混合方法研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jan 17;11:23779608251313897. doi: 10.1177/23779608251313897. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Coerced Condomless Sex: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies.强迫无保护性行为:定性研究的范围综述
J Sex Res. 2024 Jun 24:1-16. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2365936.
5
A qualitative exploration of reproductive coercion experiences and perceptions in four geo-culturally diverse sub-Saharan African settings.对撒哈拉以南非洲四个地理文化多样地区的生殖胁迫经历与认知的质性探索。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2024 Jun;5:100383. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100383.
6
Intimate partner violence influences modern family planning use among married women in Tanzania: cross-sectional study.亲密伴侣暴力影响坦桑尼亚已婚妇女现代计划生育的使用:横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17666-z.
7
Effects of a clinic-based reproductive empowerment intervention on proximal outcomes of contraceptive use, self-efficacy, attitudes, and awareness and use of survivor services: a cluster-controlled trial in Nairobi, Kenya.以诊所为基础的生殖权利赋权干预对避孕使用的近期结局、自我效能、态度以及对幸存者服务的认识和使用的影响:肯尼亚内罗毕的一项群组对照试验。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2227371. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2227371.
8
Reproductive Coercion by Intimate Partners: Prevalence and Correlates in Canadian Individuals with the Capacity to be Pregnant.亲密伴侣的生殖强迫:有生育能力的加拿大个体中的流行率和相关因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0283240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283240. eCollection 2023.
9
Canadian service providers' perspectives on reproductive coercion and abuse: a participatory action research to address their needs and support their actions.加拿大服务提供者对生殖强迫和虐待的看法:一项参与式行动研究,旨在满足他们的需求并支持他们的行动。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jun 30;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01640-w.
10
Intersection of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence: cross-sectional influences on women's contraceptive use in Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire and Kenya.生育胁迫与亲密伴侣暴力的交叉:布基纳法索、科特迪瓦和肯尼亚对女性避孕使用的横断面影响。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e065697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065697.