Suppr超能文献

一项随机临床试验,比较电话随访联合或不联合邮寄宣传材料对难以接触的患者人群进行丙型肝炎筛查的效果。

Randomized Clinical Trial of Inreach With or Without Mailed Outreach to Promote Hepatitis C Screening in a Difficult-to-Reach Patient Population.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Parkland Health & Hospital System, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):976-983. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001085.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment can significantly reduce the risk of liver-related mortality; however, many patients remain unaware of their infection in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of inreach, with and without mailed outreach, to increase HCV screening and follow-up in a large, difficult-to-reach patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic randomized clinical trial from August 2018 to May 2019 in a large safety-net health system. Patients born between 1945 and 1965 were randomly assigned (1:1) to inreach with an electronic health record reminder to providers (n = 6,195) or inreach plus mailed HCV screening outreach (n = 6,191) to complete HCV antibody screening. Outreach also included processes to promote HCV RNA testing among those with a positive HCV antibody and linkage to care among those with positive HCV RNA. The primary outcome was completion of HCV antibody testing within 3 months of randomization (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03706742).

RESULTS

We included 12,386 eligible patients (median age 60 years; 46.5% Hispanic, 33.0% Black, and 16.0% White). In intent-to-treat analyses, HCV screening completion was significantly higher among inreach-plus-outreach patients than inreach-alone patients at 3 months (14.6% vs 7.4%, P < 0.001) and 6 months (17.4% vs 9.8%, P < 0.001) after randomization. Among those who completed HCV screening within 6 months, a higher proportion of inreach-plus-outreach patients with positive antibody results completed RNA testing within 3 months than inreach-alone patients (81.1% vs 57.1%, respectively, P = 0.02); however, linkage to care within 3 months of HCV infection confirmation did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (48.1% vs 75.0%, respectively, P = 0.24).

DISCUSSION

Among difficult-to-reach patients, a combination of inreach and mailed outreach significantly increased HCV screening compared with inreach alone. However, HCV screening completion in both arms remained low, highlighting a need for more intensive interventions.

摘要

简介

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗可显著降低与肝脏相关的死亡率;然而,在临床实践中,许多患者仍未意识到自己的感染。本研究旨在比较深入治疗,联合和不联合邮件外展,以增加在一个大型、难以接触的患者群体中的 HCV 筛查和随访。

方法

我们于 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 5 月在一个大型的安全网卫生系统中进行了一项实用的随机临床试验。1945 年至 1965 年间出生的患者被随机分配(1:1)接受电子病历提醒提供者的深入治疗(n = 6195)或深入治疗加邮寄 HCV 筛查外展(n = 6191)以完成 HCV 抗体筛查。外展还包括促进 HCV 抗体阳性者进行 HCV RNA 检测以及将 HCV RNA 阳性者与护理联系起来的流程。主要结局是在随机分组后 3 个月内完成 HCV 抗体检测(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03706742)。

结果

我们纳入了 12386 名符合条件的患者(中位年龄 60 岁;46.5%为西班牙裔,33.0%为黑人,16.0%为白人)。在意向治疗分析中,在随机分组后 3 个月(14.6%对 7.4%,P < 0.001)和 6 个月(17.4%对 9.8%,P < 0.001)时,深入治疗加外展患者的 HCV 筛查完成率明显高于深入治疗单一组。在 6 个月内完成 HCV 筛查的患者中,与深入治疗单一组相比,抗体结果阳性的深入治疗加外展患者在 3 个月内完成 RNA 检测的比例更高(分别为 81.1%和 57.1%,P = 0.02);然而,两组患者在 HCV 感染确认后 3 个月内联系护理的比例无显著差异(分别为 48.1%和 75.0%,P = 0.24)。

讨论

在难以接触的患者中,与单独深入治疗相比,深入治疗加邮件外展显著增加了 HCV 筛查。然而,两组的 HCV 筛查完成率仍然较低,这突出表明需要更强化的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验