University of Waterloo Department of Kinesiology, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Simon Fraser University, Department of Gerontology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Sep;22(9):1927-1932.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.020. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
To determine if (1) number of staff or residents, when considering home-level factors and presence of family/volunteers, are associated with relationship-centered care practices at mealtimes in general and dementia care units in long-term care (LTC); and (2) the association between number of staff and relationship-centered care is moderated by number of residents and family/volunteers, profit status or chain affiliation.
Secondary analysis of the Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3) cross-sectional multisite study.
Thirty-two Canadian LTC homes (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, and New Brunswick) and 639 residents were recruited. Eighty-two units were included, with 58 being general and 24 being dementia care units.
Trained research coordinators completed the Mealtime Scan (MTS) for LTC at 4 to 6 mealtimes in each unit to determine number of staff, residents, and family or volunteers present. Relationship-centered care was assessed using the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist. The director of care or food services manager completed a home survey describing home sector and chain affiliation. Multivariable analyses were stratified by type of unit.
In general care units, the number of residents was negatively (P = .009), and number of staff positively (P < .001) associated with relationship-centered care (F = 5.48, P < .001). For dementia care units, the associations were nonsignificant (F = 2.74, P = .05). The association between staffing and relationship-centered care was not moderated by any variables in either general or dementia care units.
Number of staff in general care units may increase relationship-centered care at mealtimes in LTC. Number of residents or staff did not significantly affect relationship-centered care in dementia care units, suggesting that other factors such as additional training may better explain relationship-centered care in these units. Mandating minimum staffing and additional training at the federal level should be considered to ensure that staff have the capacity to deliver relationship-centered care at mealtimes, which is considered a best practice.
确定(1)在考虑家庭/志愿者存在的家庭层面因素时,员工或居民人数与一般用餐时间和长期护理(LTC)中的痴呆症护理单元中的以关系为中心的护理实践之间是否存在关联;以及(2)员工人数与以关系为中心的护理之间的关联是否受到居民人数和家庭/志愿者人数、盈利状况或连锁隶属关系的调节。
对“充分利用用餐时间”(M3)的横断面多地点研究的二次分析。
在加拿大的 32 家长期护理院(艾伯塔省、马尼托巴省、安大略省和新不伦瑞克省)招募了 639 名居民。共招募了 82 个单位,其中 58 个为普通单位,24 个为痴呆症护理单位。
经过培训的研究协调员在每个单位的 4 到 6 次用餐时间内完成了 LTC 的“用餐时间扫描”(MTS),以确定员工、居民和家庭或志愿者的数量。使用“用餐时间关系护理检查表”评估以关系为中心的护理。护理主任或餐饮服务经理完成了一份家庭调查问卷,描述了家庭部门和连锁隶属关系。多元分析按单位类型分层。
在普通护理单元中,居民人数与以关系为中心的护理呈负相关(P=0.009),员工人数与以关系为中心的护理呈正相关(P<0.001)(F=5.48,P<0.001)。对于痴呆症护理单元,相关性不显著(F=2.74,P=0.05)。在普通护理或痴呆症护理单元中,工作人员数量与以关系为中心的护理之间的关联均不受任何变量的调节。
普通护理单元中员工人数的增加可能会增加长期护理中用餐时间的以关系为中心的护理。居民人数或员工人数并未显著影响痴呆症护理单元中的以关系为中心的护理,这表明其他因素,例如额外的培训,可以更好地解释这些单元中的以关系为中心的护理。应考虑在联邦一级规定最低工作人员配置并进行额外培训,以确保工作人员有能力在用餐时间提供以关系为中心的护理,这被认为是最佳实践。