Gurung Shreemouna, Chaudhury Habib
Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Sep;44(9):1513-1532. doi: 10.1177/07334648241309761. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
This scoping review, following Levac et al.'s methodology, examines the implementation and impact of relationship-centered care (RCC) in long-term care (LTC) settings for older adults. Peer-reviewed articles from AgeLine, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were included if published after 2000, involved older adults in LTC homes, focused on RCC, and conducted in Australia, Europe, New Zealand, or North America. Key findings were organized using inductive content analysis, and 41 empirical studies with qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs were included. Three categories emerged: (1) Core Practices of RCC-relationship building and reciprocal exchange; (2) Transformative Impacts of RCC-improved care quality and collaboration; and (3) Pathways and Roadblocks to RCC-individual and organizational factors. By understanding the key elements, facilitators, and barriers of RCC, policymakers and practitioners can develop targeted strategies to improve care experiences and outcomes for residents, families, staff, and all others involved in LTC.
本综述采用莱瓦克等人的方法,探讨了以关系为中心的护理(RCC)在老年人长期护理(LTC)环境中的实施情况及其影响。纳入了2000年后发表的、来自AgeLine、CINAHL Complete、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Web of Science的同行评审文章,这些文章涉及长期护理机构中的老年人、聚焦于以关系为中心的护理,且研究在澳大利亚、欧洲、新西兰或北美开展。主要研究结果采用归纳性内容分析法进行整理,共纳入41项采用定性、定量和混合方法设计的实证研究。研究结果分为三类:(1)以关系为中心的护理的核心实践——建立关系和相互交流;(2)以关系为中心的护理的变革性影响——改善护理质量和协作;(3)以关系为中心的护理的途径和障碍——个人和组织因素。通过了解以关系为中心的护理的关键要素、促进因素和障碍,政策制定者和从业者可以制定有针对性的策略,以改善居民、家庭、工作人员以及所有参与长期护理的其他人的护理体验和护理结果。