Suppr超能文献

房颤患者中 SAMe-TTR 评分与抗凝药物选择的关系:GLORIA-AF 注册研究。

Anticoagulant selection in relation to the SAMe-TTR score in patients with atrial fibrillation: The GLORIA-AF registry.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.

Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 Mar-Apr;62(2):152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

Abstract

AIM

The SAMe-TTR score helps identify patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) likely to have poor anticoagulation control during anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and those with scores >2 might be better managed with a target-specific oral anticoagulant (NOAC). We hypothesized that in clinical practice, VKAs may be prescribed less frequently to patients with AF and SAMe-TTR scores >2 than to patients with lower scores.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed the Phase III dataset of the Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF), a large, global, prospective global registry of patients with newly diagnosed AF and ≥1 stroke risk factor. We compared baseline clinical characteristics and antithrombotic prescriptions to determine the probability of the VKA prescription among anticoagulated patients with the baseline SAMe-TTR score >2 and ≤ 2. Among 17,465 anticoagulated patients with AF, 4,828 (27.6%) patients were prescribed VKA and 12,637 (72.4%) patients an NOAC: 11,884 (68.0%) patients had SAMe-TTR scores 0-2 and 5,581 (32.0%) patients had scores >2. The proportion of patients prescribed VKA was 28.0% among patients with SAMe-TTR scores >2 and 27.5% in those with scores ≤2.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of a clear association between the SAMe-TTR score and anticoagulant selection may be attributed to the relative efficacy and safety profiles between NOACs and VKAs as well as to the absence of trial evidence that an SAMe-TTR-guided strategy for the selection of the type of anticoagulation in NVAF patients has an impact on clinical outcomes of efficacy and safety. The latter hypothesis is currently being tested in a randomized controlled trial.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov//Unique identifier: NCT01937377, NCT01468701, and NCT01671007.

摘要

目的

SAMe-TTR 评分有助于识别接受维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)抗凝治疗的心房颤动(AF)患者抗凝控制不佳的情况,评分>2 的患者可能需要使用靶向特定的口服抗凝剂(NOAC)进行更好的管理。我们假设,在临床实践中,SAMe-TTR 评分>2 的 AF 患者接受 VKA 治疗的频率可能低于评分较低的患者。

方法和结果

我们分析了 III 期全球心房颤动患者长期口服抗血栓治疗登记研究(GLORIA-AF)的数据集,这是一项大型、全球性、前瞻性的新诊断 AF 患者和≥1 个卒中危险因素的全球登记研究。我们比较了基线临床特征和抗血栓治疗处方,以确定基线 SAMe-TTR 评分>2 和≤2 的抗凝患者中 VKA 处方的概率。在 17465 例接受抗凝治疗的 AF 患者中,4828 例(27.6%)患者接受了 VKA 治疗,12637 例(72.4%)患者接受了 NOAC 治疗:11884 例(68.0%)患者的 SAMe-TTR 评分 0-2,5581 例(32.0%)患者的评分>2。SAMe-TTR 评分>2 的患者中 VKA 处方的比例为 28.0%,评分≤2 的患者中为 27.5%。

结论

SAMe-TTR 评分与抗凝药物选择之间缺乏明确的关联,可能归因于 NOAC 和 VKA 之间的相对疗效和安全性特征,以及缺乏试验证据表明,在 NVAF 患者中,SAMe-TTR 指导的抗凝类型选择策略对疗效和安全性的临床结局有影响。后一种假设目前正在一项随机对照试验中进行测试。

临床试验注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov//唯一标识符:NCT01937377、NCT01468701 和 NCT01671007。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验