• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生行为问题与教师强制。中小学教育教师中情境因素的比较研究。

Student Misbehaviour and Teacher Coercion. A Comparative Study of Contextual Factors in Primary and Secondary Education Teachers.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Sociology, Faculty of Education, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

Department of Psychology and Sociology, Faculty of Health of Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 16;17(24):9429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249429.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17249429
PMID:33339201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7765574/
Abstract

This study analyses the relation between student misbehaviour and teacher coercion from a teacher perspective by taking further contextual variables into account. Our participants were 480 male/female secondary education and 351 primary education teachers from the Spanish Autonomous Community of Aragón (Spain). This study forms part of the 2017 Coexistence Study in Aragón Education Centres. According to the theoretical framework and the SEM (structural equation modeling), the results revealed a close relationship between student misbehaviour and teacher coercion, although other contextual variables also appeared in the regression equation: in coexistence rules and in teacher competence. We ultimately found a certain degree of difference between the primary and secondary education levels. On the secondary school level, teacher conflicts were associated with student misbehaviour, while coexistence rules and participative and inclusive activities predicted teacher coercion. Conversely, on the primary school level, participative and inclusive activities predict a lower frequency of student misbehaviour, while teacher competence predicts a lower frequency of teacher coercion.

摘要

这项研究从教师的角度出发,分析了学生行为不当与教师强制之间的关系,并考虑了其他一些情境变量。我们的参与者包括来自西班牙阿拉贡自治区的 480 名男女中学教育教师和 351 名小学教育教师。这项研究是 2017 年阿拉贡教育中心共存研究的一部分。根据理论框架和 SEM(结构方程建模),研究结果表明,学生行为不当与教师强制之间存在密切关系,但回归方程中还出现了其他情境变量:在共存规则和教师能力方面。我们最终发现中小学教育阶段之间存在一定程度的差异。在中学阶段,教师冲突与学生行为不当有关,而共存规则和参与式、包容性活动则预示着教师强制。相反,在小学阶段,参与式和包容性活动预示着学生行为不当的频率较低,而教师能力则预示着教师强制的频率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f22/7765574/b5b1d0645e9e/ijerph-17-09429-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f22/7765574/13587821721a/ijerph-17-09429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f22/7765574/bb9f191e664d/ijerph-17-09429-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f22/7765574/b5b1d0645e9e/ijerph-17-09429-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f22/7765574/13587821721a/ijerph-17-09429-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f22/7765574/bb9f191e664d/ijerph-17-09429-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f22/7765574/b5b1d0645e9e/ijerph-17-09429-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Student Misbehaviour and Teacher Coercion. A Comparative Study of Contextual Factors in Primary and Secondary Education Teachers.学生行为问题与教师强制。中小学教育教师中情境因素的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 16;17(24):9429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249429.
2
Conventional wisdom is a poor predictor of the relationship between discipline policy, student misbehaviour and teacher stress.传统观念很难预测纪律政策、学生不当行为和教师压力之间的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 1995 Mar;65 ( Pt 1):27-48. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01129.x.
3
An investigation of the mechanism underlying teacher aggression: Testing I theory and the General Aggression Model.教师攻击行为的作用机制研究:检验 I 理论和一般攻击模型。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Dec;87(4):497-517. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12161. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
Similarities and dissimilarities between teachers' and students' relationship views in upper elementary school: The role of personal teacher and student attributes.小学高年段师生关系观点的异同:个人教师和学生属性的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Oct;64:43-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Association between student-teacher ratio and teachers' working hours and workload stress: evidence from a nationwide survey in Japan.师生比与教师工作时间和工作负荷压力之间的关系:来自日本全国性调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):1635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11677-w.
6
Understanding behavioural engagement and achievement: The roles of teaching practices and student sense of competence and task value.理解行为参与和成就:教学实践以及学生能力感和任务价值的作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Dec;90(4):887-909. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12342. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Academic Competence, Teacher-Student Relationship, and Violence and Victimisation in Adolescents: The Classroom Climate as a Mediator.学业能力、师生关系与青少年的暴力和受害行为:课堂氛围的中介作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 28;18(3):1163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031163.
8
The Role of Dyadic Teacher-Student Relationships for Primary School Teachers' Well-Being.师生关系对小学教师幸福感的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054053.
9
The impact of western schools on girls' expectations: a Togolese case.西方学校对女孩期望的影响:多哥的案例。
Comp Educ Rev. 1980 Jun;24(2):S196-208. doi: 10.1086/446146.
10
The influence of fidelity of implementation on teacher-student interaction quality in the context of a randomized controlled trial of the Responsive Classroom approach.实施保真度对“回应性课堂”教学法随机对照试验中师生互动质量的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Aug;51(4):437-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The emotional and motivational costs of poorly delivered academic feedback.学术反馈传达不当所带来的情感和动机方面的代价。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 30;16:1585447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1585447. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlates of students' internalization and defiance of classroom rules: A self-determination theory perspective.学生内化和违反课堂规则的相关因素:自我决定理论视角。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Mar;89(1):22-40. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12213. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
2
Peer bullying and disruption-coercion escalations in student-teacher relationship.学生-教师关系中的同伴欺凌和破坏-胁迫升级。
Psicothema. 2013;25(2):206-13. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2012.312.
3
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.确保尺度差异卡方检验统计量的正值性。
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
4
[Family communication styles, attitude towards institutional authority and adolescents' violent behaviour at school].[家庭沟通方式、对学校制度权威的态度与青少年在学校的暴力行为]
Psicothema. 2007 Feb;19(1):108-13.
5
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.结构方程分析报告的原则与实践
Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):64-82. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64.