Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60025, USA.
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Northwestern University Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, 355 E Erie St. 19th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021 Feb;83:115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.11.024. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
Rehabilitation therapies are critical for optimizing quality-of-life and daily functions for individuals living with Parkinson's disease (PD). Thus, understanding the patterns of and under what conditions physicians make rehabilitation referrals is important for optimizing care.
We analyzed data from 5020 participants (4 countries) collected from 1/3/2016 to 4/20/2018 as part of the Parkinson's Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative (PF QII). Data were analyzed for single discipline and multidiscipline referrals to speech language pathology (SLP), physical therapy (PT), and occupational therapy (OT). Group comparisons (referred vs. not-referred) and regression procedures were implemented to determine demographic and clinical variables that were associated with an increased likelihood of rehabilitation referral.
35.3% of participants were referred to rehabilitation services. Of these, 25.1% received a multidiscipline referral. There was a statistically significant effect of disease stage on both single discipline (χ(2) = 45.1, p < 0.0001) and multidiscipline (χ(2) = 74.2, p < 0.0001) referrals, with higher rates in later stages. Referred vs. not-referred participants differed significantly on a number of variables; however, only falls in the 6-months prior, advanced- and moderate-stage disease, older age, hospital admissions, and higher caregiver burden were associated with an increased likelihood of rehabilitation referral (adjusted odds ratios ≥ 1, Range = 1.08 to 1.62).
Despite evidence supporting multidiscipline and proactive rehabilitation in PD, the majority of referrals were made to a single service and may be reactions to falls or advancing disease. Data suggest there may be missed opportunities for optimizing care through proactive rehabilitation interventions.
康复疗法对于优化帕金森病(PD)患者的生活质量和日常功能至关重要。因此,了解医生进行康复转介的模式和条件对于优化治疗至关重要。
我们分析了 2016 年 1 月 3 日至 2018 年 4 月 20 日期间作为帕金森基金会质量改进倡议(PF QII)一部分从 5020 名参与者(来自 4 个国家)收集的数据。对言语治疗(SLP)、物理治疗(PT)和职业治疗(OT)的单一学科和多学科转介进行数据分析。实施了组比较(转介与未转介)和回归程序,以确定与增加康复转介可能性相关的人口统计学和临床变量。
35.3%的参与者被转介到康复服务。其中,25.1%接受了多学科转介。单一学科(χ(2) = 45.1,p < 0.0001)和多学科(χ(2) = 74.2,p < 0.0001)转介都存在疾病阶段的统计学显著影响,晚期阶段的比率更高。转介与未转介参与者在许多变量上存在显著差异;然而,只有在过去 6 个月内跌倒、晚期和中度疾病、年龄较大、住院和较高的照顾者负担与增加康复转介的可能性相关(调整后的优势比≥1,范围为 1.08 至 1.62)。
尽管有证据支持 PD 中的多学科和主动康复,但大多数转介都是针对单一服务,可能是对跌倒或疾病进展的反应。数据表明,通过主动康复干预优化治疗可能存在错失的机会。