• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状透析依赖患者颈动脉血运重建的围手术期结果符合血管外科学会指南。

Perioperative outcomes for carotid revascularization on asymptomatic dialysis-dependent patients meet Society for Vascular Society guidelines.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.044. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.044
PMID:33340696
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines recommend carotid revascularization for asymptomatic disease in patients with at least a 3-year life expectancy and stenosis >60% when the expected perioperative stroke and death rate is <3%. Based on this recommendation, it was previously determined that asymptomatic patients who require dialysis would not meet the perioperative stroke and death thresholds nor the long-term survival benchmarks to justify carotid surgery. To determine whether carotid surgery for patients requiring dialysis is appropriate, the present study compared the perioperative outcomes after carotid revascularization for dialysis-dependent patients relative to nondialysis patients in a contemporary, national cohort.

METHODS

The targeted vascular module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients who undergone carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic carotid disease from 2011 to 2018. The cohort was categorized as requiring or not requiring dialysis. The primary 30-day outcomes included mortality and the composite of stroke/death and stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI). Univariate analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariable analyses were used to assess the independent associations of the estimated glomerular filtration rate and dialysis dependence with the stroke/death rate.

RESULTS

A total of 17,579 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 226 (1.3%) required dialysis at revascularization. No difference was found in the degree of severe stenosis (80%-99%) demonstrated by 69% of the dialysis cohort and 72% of the nondialysis cohort (P = .9). Of the dialysis and nondialysis cohorts, 5% and 3.6% underwent carotid artery stenting (P = .3). The dialysis-dependent patients were younger (68 vs 71 years; P < .001) and were more likely to have insulin-dependent diabetes (47% vs 12%; P < .001), congestive heart failure (8.4% vs 1.4%; P < .001), and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15% vs 10%; P = .03). In the dialysis and nondialysis cohort, 2 (0.9%) and 88 (0.5%) patients died (P = .3); 4 (1.8%) and 247 (1.4%) experienced strokes (P = .6); and 3 (1.3%) and 185 (1.1%) patients experienced MI (P = .5), respectively. The composite outcomes of stroke/death and stroke/death/MI was 2.2% (n = 5) and 1.8% (n = 319; P = .6) and 3.5% (n = 8) and 2.8% (n = 479; P = .4) in the dialysis and nondialysis cohorts, respectively. After multivariable analysis, neither the estimated glomerular filtration rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01; P = .26) nor dialysis dependence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.57; P = .13) was independently associated with the composite outcome of stroke/death.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day carotid revascularization outcomes for asymptomatic disease in dialysis-dependent patients met the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines in this national cohort and might be better than previously surmised. Hence, vascular surgeons could consider carotid revascularization for select dialysis-dependent patients with the appropriate expected longevity and perioperative risk.

摘要

目的

当前的血管外科学会实践指南建议对至少有 3 年预期寿命且狭窄程度>60%的无症状疾病患者进行颈动脉血运重建,如果围手术期卒中发生率和死亡率<3%。基于这一建议,先前确定需要透析的无症状患者既不符合围手术期卒中发生率和死亡率的阈值,也不符合长期生存的基准,无法进行颈动脉手术。为了确定对需要透析的患者进行颈动脉手术是否合适,本研究比较了在当代全国队列中,需要透析的患者与非透析患者在颈动脉血运重建后围手术期结局的差异。

方法

从美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划的靶向血管模块中查询了 2011 年至 2018 年接受无症状颈动脉疾病颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术的患者。该队列分为需要或不需要透析。主要的 30 天结局包括死亡率和卒中/死亡及卒中/死亡/心肌梗死(MI)的复合结局。使用 Fisher 确切检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验进行单变量分析。使用多变量分析评估估计肾小球滤过率和透析依赖与卒中/死亡率的独立关联。

结果

共有 17579 名患者符合纳入标准。其中,226 名(1.3%)患者在血运重建时需要透析。透析组和非透析组的严重狭窄程度(80%-99%)分别为 69%和 72%(P=0.9),差异无统计学意义。在透析组和非透析组中,5%和 3.6%的患者接受颈动脉支架置入术(P=0.3)。依赖透析的患者更年轻(68 岁 vs 71 岁;P<0.001),更可能患有胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(47% vs 12%;P<0.001)、充血性心力衰竭(8.4% vs 1.4%;P<0.001)和严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(15% vs 10%;P=0.03)。在透析组和非透析组中,分别有 2 名(0.9%)和 88 名(0.5%)患者死亡(P=0.3);4 名(1.8%)和 247 名(1.4%)患者发生卒中(P=0.6);3 名(1.3%)和 185 名(1.1%)患者发生 MI(P=0.5)。在透析组和非透析组中,卒中/死亡和卒中/死亡/心肌梗死的复合结局发生率分别为 2.2%(n=5)和 1.8%(n=319;P=0.6)和 3.5%(n=8)和 2.8%(n=479;P=0.4)。多变量分析后,估计肾小球滤过率(调整比值比,1.0;95%置信区间,1.00-1.01;P=0.26)和透析依赖(调整比值比,0.21;95%置信区间,0.03-1.57;P=0.13)均与卒中/死亡的复合结局无独立关联。

结论

在这个全国队列中,依赖透析的无症状疾病患者颈动脉血运重建的 30 天结局符合血管外科学会的指南,可能优于先前的推测。因此,血管外科医生可以考虑为符合预期寿命和围手术期风险标准的特定依赖透析的患者进行颈动脉血运重建。

相似文献

1
Perioperative outcomes for carotid revascularization on asymptomatic dialysis-dependent patients meet Society for Vascular Society guidelines.无症状透析依赖患者颈动脉血运重建的围手术期结果符合血管外科学会指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.044. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Outcomes of carotid revascularization stratified by procedure in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 and dialysis patients.估计肾小球滤过率<30 且透析患者的颈动脉血运重建术按手术分层的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1464-1474.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Revascularization of asymptomatic carotid stenosis is not appropriate in patients on dialysis.对于正在接受透析治疗的患者,对无症状性颈动脉狭窄进行血管重建术并不合适。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.002.
4
In-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的院内转归。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.029. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Carotid endarterectomy and transcarotid artery revascularization can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.颈动脉内膜切除术和经颈动脉血管重建术可在慢性肾脏病患者中以可接受的发病率和死亡率进行。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.045. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
6
An analysis of the recommendations of the 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.对 2022 年血管外科学会无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者临床实践指南建议的分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 May;79(5):1235-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.12.041. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
7
The impact of age on in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy.年龄对经颈动脉血管重建术、经股颈动脉血管支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术住院治疗结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):931-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
8
Investigation of the weekend effect on perioperative complications and mortality after carotid revascularization.调查颈动脉血运重建术后围手术期并发症和死亡率的周末效应。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1487-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.06.163. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
9
Perioperative and long-term impact of chronic kidney disease on carotid artery interventions.慢性肾脏病对颈动脉介入治疗的围手术期及长期影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1295-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.038.
10
Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stents Should Be Used with Caution in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者,经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术应谨慎使用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in cerebral oxygenation during hemodialysis before and after carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术前及术后血液透析期间脑氧合的变化
Radiol Case Rep. 2022 May 27;17(8):2589-2593. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.04.054. eCollection 2022 Aug.